Re: [tap] "ok 1 description" vs "ok 1 - description"

Leon Timmermans <fawaka@gmail.com> Wed, 04 February 2009 14:36 UTC

Return-Path: <fawaka@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D1C3A6BFE for <tap@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 06:36:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.855
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.855 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.745, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SeO0auvHEvRx for <tap@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 06:36:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.189]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C06D3A6802 for <tap@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 06:36:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f33so2106217fkf.5 for <tap@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 06:36:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xn+gC1SVBMvSFFPJ+ZU3WCzhH3lNLe0C8dsxvd4NyOM=; b=XdUpUs6Pv3hiinB3cu6guTTBl5RHhe0GjF2Dea5CH8rHc3asVbTQrU/o3+Cy52cnah dw0XVmCiTDAjPrjn6qBK3BYjRS/Ryfdp2pB38EO6iJjiDpAddavVDPR2pAswd286YShK ibyso0sx7l7JQ05rax4YXKQmWU6zzpsC+GuPU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=aKLOsJLSf4snIV8tNovgAPVvNaqG0VE2R7nHMzYX8QJDJNLOoznzjrJRvr/HguESre fbdPCwfN4jpTlV40w3+BLhfjqULn8TwNvD3uBLF2XNdQ5Oj1ObEFNMrDDbGGTZKmb06D GiXfcHKGibt+j6jfD3X9rbpXeMsVMfBrt/oMA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.104.140 with SMTP id p12mr527835fao.7.1233758172209; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 06:36:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4989A2F7.1010304@plusthree.com>
References: <497A77D0.8070500@pobox.com> <87vds4podb.fsf@renormalist.net> <497B8530.4080903@pobox.com> <873aezxgen.fsf@renormalist.net> <4984E18D.7000606@pobox.com> <87tz7fvv0h.fsf@renormalist.net> <49850F8C.4020904@pobox.com> <87eiyhvr4f.fsf@renormalist.net> <49893207.30406@pobox.com> <4989A2F7.1010304@plusthree.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:36:12 +0100
Message-ID: <a51e610c0902040636r2a77c337uff3b0254af1b527c@mail.gmail.com>
From: Leon Timmermans <fawaka@gmail.com>
To: tap@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [tap] "ok 1 description" vs "ok 1 - description"
X-BeenThere: tap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Test Anything Protocol WG discussions <tap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tap>, <mailto:tap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tap>
List-Post: <mailto:tap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tap>, <mailto:tap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:36:34 -0000

On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Michael Peters <mpeters@plusthree.com> wrote:
>
> What about a description that begins with a negative number? Like say:
>
>  -1 < 0 ?
>

As long as there is no space between the minus and the number, it
won't get chopped off.

Leon