Re: [tap] "ok 1 description" vs "ok 1 - description"

Steffen Schwigon <ss5@renormalist.net> Sun, 01 February 2009 00:52 UTC

Return-Path: <tap-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tap-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tap-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 009703A68CB; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:52:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: tap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA573A68E4 for <tap@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:52:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h4QyzOQknXRp for <tap@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:52:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from h132974.serverkompetenz.net (renormalist.net [81.169.141.46]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89ED3A68CB for <tap@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:52:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ss5 by h132974.serverkompetenz.net with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <ss5@renormalist.net>) id 1LTQZK-0005eU-EN for tap@ietf.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:52:14 +0100
To: tap@ietf.org
References: <497A77D0.8070500@pobox.com> <335014.20536.qm@web65715.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <20090124115427.GC9114@pjcj.net> <87vds4podb.fsf@renormalist.net> <497B8530.4080903@pobox.com> <873aezxgen.fsf@renormalist.net> <4984E18D.7000606@pobox.com>
From: Steffen Schwigon <ss5@renormalist.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:52:14 +0100
In-Reply-To: <4984E18D.7000606@pobox.com> (Michael G. Schwern's message of "Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:41:01 -0800")
Message-ID: <87tz7fvv0h.fsf@renormalist.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) XEmacs/21.4.19 (linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [tap] "ok 1 description" vs "ok 1 - description"
X-BeenThere: tap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Test Anything Protocol WG discussions <tap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tap>, <mailto:tap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/tap>
List-Post: <mailto:tap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tap>, <mailto:tap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: tap-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tap-bounces@ietf.org

Michael G Schwern <schwern@pobox.com> writes:
> Steffen Schwigon wrote:
>> I see that the dash was meant optional for TAP. Maybe the
>> optionality of the dash changed in TAP::Parser 3? Admittedly, I
>> didn't try.
>
> The last version of Test::Harness 2 before TAP::Parser strips the
> dash if its there
>
> But earlier versions of TH2 do not.
>
> TAP::Parser (aka Test::Harness 3) does not strip the dash.

So it already flip-flop'ed in the short history

 TH2early (not stripped),
 TH2late  (stripped),
 TH3/TP   (not stripped),

?

I agree then that stripping the dash from description might not be so
end-of-world as I initially thought.

I'm maybe one of the very few who currently depend on the exact
descriptions but I can probably even change my evaluation tools.

Kind regards,
Steffen 
-- 
Steffen Schwigon <ss5@renormalist.net>
Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
German Perl-Workshop 2009 <http://www.perl-workshop.de/en/2009>
_______________________________________________
tap mailing list
tap@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tap