IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tap] "ok 1 description" vs "ok 1 - description"

Ovid <publiustemp-tapx@yahoo.com> Sat, 24 January 2009 09:55 UTC

Return-Path: <tap-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tap-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tap-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CFF43A67B3; Sat, 24 Jan 2009 01:55:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: tap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2491B3A68E0 for <tap@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Jan 2009 01:55:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KoZWKY7jZRNg for <tap@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Jan 2009 01:55:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from web65715.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (web65715.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [76.13.9.107]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 37F233A67B3 for <tap@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Jan 2009 01:55:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 22115 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Jan 2009 09:55:06 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=XDFNMUVZVV8p/2PiKVESH+eLUE4EE6+The/30wLqqALQ8WuucZI0RDJwJxoER5X2IqfbTuOgrf8/aGeM0aa+u+0x6XiqNiv2FAgE1jxBk+LzgahRmOjqUk+shuR1I/eIRbFFxeedc/T3c+Fi/2JNcCwpVybG3C919C/6+KWaoSU=;
X-YMail-OSG: sJEToLgVM1n.FNQ_BWxAgfkH8n.GlK.JkRvISA546shbp1anjc7l4X5OFILF_6fpCA43uWADzzAANb3F_Aa.6YkGSZNikmKIcKcs32CLuYow2luPFhtOSD8mUcAGdERudckpVKOgCCn1A.hHpbl.xFztemDAGR.9Knyo_Wj7Iib7xTcO9oxVgJI9.uNirFydFnaPUkccqChKinQCiA--
Received: from [82.153.209.99] by web65715.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 24 Jan 2009 01:55:06 PST
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1155.45 YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1
References: <497A77D0.8070500@pobox.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 01:55:06 -0800
From: Ovid <publiustemp-tapx@yahoo.com>
To: Michael G Schwern <schwern@pobox.com>, tap@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <335014.20536.qm@web65715.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [tap] "ok 1 description" vs "ok 1 - description"
X-BeenThere: tap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Test Anything Protocol WG discussions <tap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tap>, <mailto:tap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/tap>
List-Post: <mailto:tap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tap>, <mailto:tap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: tap-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tap-bounces@ietf.org

----- Original Message ----

> From: Michael G Schwern <schwern@pobox.com>

> Test-Result     = Status [SP Test-Number] [SP Description]
>                    [SP "#" SP Directive [SP Reason]] EOL
> 
> to
> 
> Test-Result     = Status [SP Test-Number] [SP -] [SP Description]
>                    [SP "#" SP Directive [SP Reason]] EOL
> 
> The dash is simply ignored if it's there.
> 
> Yay or nay?

So everyone who's written a TAP producer in another language and
didn't see fit to add that dash will now be producing invalid TAP?

 
Cheers,
Ovid
--
Buy the book         - http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/
Tech blog            - http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/
Twitter              - http://twitter.com/OvidPerl
Official Perl 6 Wiki - http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl6
_______________________________________________
tap mailing list
tap@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tap

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email