IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] AD Review: draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-09

Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Thu, 28 January 2010 22:14 UTC

Return-Path: <fernando.gont.netbook.win@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 387B53A68B3 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:14:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.24
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.24 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.359, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WSEQKhwFGQmF for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:13:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-f133.google.com (mail-yw0-f133.google.com [209.85.211.133]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C9C3A68A9 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:13:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ywh39 with SMTP id 39so286229ywh.17 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:14:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/VSgsE93Iz5bs+5zT1ndi2jDExnM0ncepbqpbkklk0o=; b=o4co8OdRr6ImwnLyKEWDtq2HQUfOLt1i8GRKXOLd6B9WgeiFepOQKrh3/xor74vGlT C41nOewMJGmxECWgCLufHoo0VIw7s+8AHnVmpr64H5TPOjY11zUQwFS1A2JW2zRcaIhu h701bl5m/3QiQ92S/uHWpryWojJ6JlfDHYfK8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=PY3mH9/o30B53eHumpJtfZGsI9G6XDbvcnlqT4njQFF1LX41ZccjbKgnZLfk8ost0A zyZ/90XjzhZaHcRGjCT6T6x5I8fvOvPK79wmU6gnycTg4LF2Erp8KlV8ku5BbKhTfj4w itZqmwDUdjP8hG+iWugJM5pq9eXBj7lp53D14=
Received: by 10.100.75.12 with SMTP id x12mr6984174ana.151.1264716845633; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:14:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?192.168.0.100? (129-130-17-190.fibertel.com.ar [190.17.130.129]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm482041ywd.29.2010.01.28.14.14.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:14:04 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Fernando Gont <fernando.gont.netbook.win@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4B620C1D.4060007@gont.com.ar>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:13:49 -0300
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
References: <20100120010001.6D3913A67FB@core3.amsl.com> <3183E44E-124A-4C80-A112-72FBC00FEAFF@nokia.com> <4B60A022.1080006@gont.com.ar> <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB47DBBB85AF@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov> <4B60BA7F.7050308@isi.edu> <4B60BF86.8080100@gont.com.ar> <4B60C215.6000502@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4B60C215.6000502@isi.edu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
OpenPGP: id=D076FFF1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org WG" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] AD Review: draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-09
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:14:11 -0000

Hello, Joe,

>>>    We note that the counter-measures discussed in this documentare not 
>>>    part of standard TCP behavior and this document does not change that 
>>>    state of affairs.  The consensus of the TCPM WG (TCP Maintenance and 
>>>    Minor Extensions Working Group) was to document this widespread 
>>>    implementation of nonstandard TCP behavior but to not change the 
>>>    TCP standard.
> 
> Useful to fix the typo (documentare -> document are).

Will do.



> I prefer some of the text Wes provided. The text above just says "we're
> not changing the spec". Wes had an additional tone of "and we aren't
> even making any recommendations" (e.g., on how to interpret SHOULDs).

Can you Wes provide the exact text you'd like me to include in the I-D,
so that we can finish this? :-)

Thanks!

Kind regards,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email