Re: [tcpm] PLPMTUD for all protocols

Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Fri, 30 March 2018 05:46 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510A012D775 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 22:46:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.99
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.99 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mh93zzmBlXrF for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 22:46:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05620124B0A for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 22:46:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ykqRwJY7Oui0z9SirbvKqESQBTrirJuY4otzYl1tZ5U=; b=xkqh+/vNWaKGGikDS2vfzPmnk9 IoYi3zrXtBV9PmNMGLjfvdTX3y0rlwRIEXKpGu+bF63Tt0yVUabYHQv7CKCXVsEatXjwF/N124+cP zXlTD1/CtioM3p8shzfD0rjqFemFwFtwvLSQhcltkC6VdzcV6gX757jmQ6ScoQ2ofEsAsF7C3dO7W V41DInBGiiJEDEcmb1if9ALOdS3ix8THxT+MmgPdxrFQLy5dHyCBhxV5PuODjqfxJWox6+Km/Om7r G2g4re9BbuctjHdiim12y+W1ENl0PxUJrR2PM8pdzkWkco0t42Bn+BB1jnLkJCmikztY6CT61VzPJ ieekR6MA==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-240-132.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.240.132]:50273 helo=[192.168.1.189]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89_1) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1f1mrp-001Wl1-Qv; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 01:46:26 -0400
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Cc: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>, tcpm@ietf.org
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1803281034310.20609@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAP-guGVEcnk09yi8sz+fmghpeb91Y8tQb+LsEmSF+0e+f6oGhw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1803281747020.20609@uplift.swm.pp.se> <B323BA47-32DF-498B-9D1F-5A378E7ABB98@strayalpha.com> <CAP-guGXfds60dwJXgnSYdbtQ-qOCJGpiw1kcYUkJR8L3jwsFSA@mail.gmail.com> <08fb7ec5406418e439391c66bc108d5d@strayalpha.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1803300728240.20609@uplift.swm.pp.se>
From: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
Message-ID: <572210fa-74ae-0edf-ce10-d66153ae80a3@strayalpha.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 22:46:14 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1803300728240.20609@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/CDVEPckyMEd0NNiLLS6tXH7cbYY>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] PLPMTUD for all protocols
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 05:46:40 -0000


On 3/29/2018 10:38 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> ...Frankly, I don't much mind if this TCP session goes back to this
> painfully bad state every 30 seconds to re-probe the PMTUD value, at
> least it'll not be completely broken.
>
> I just want this default-on in all major TCP stacks, in the next few
> years. The simpler, the better and the higher chance that it'll get
> adopted, right? 

It would be useful to be careful. I'd rather see a TCP that runs just
fine (but maybe not as fast as you think it should) with 400 byte
packets than one that keeps bashing its head against a rock trying to
find the "best" larger packet size, failing, and "limping" along that
way continually.

Joe