Re: [tcpm] draft-minshall-nagle

David Borman <David.Borman@quantum.com> Wed, 04 June 2014 18:07 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=623253de67=david.borman@quantum.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66FA1A0312 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 11:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.267
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.267 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dnBBpRwVHP7g for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 11:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-000ceb01.pphosted.com (mx0b-000ceb01.pphosted.com [67.231.152.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B50FD1A0331 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 11:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0001151 [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-000ceb01.pphosted.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s54HxdXj004194; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 11:07:09 -0700
Received: from ppoxedge2.quantum.com ([146.174.252.28]) by mx0b-000ceb01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 1m9gk31yy6-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 04 Jun 2014 11:07:08 -0700
Received: from PPOMSG2.QUANTUM.com (10.50.35.27) by PPOXEDGE2.quantum.com (146.174.252.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 12:06:18 -0600
Received: from PPOMSG1.QUANTUM.com ([10.50.35.26]) by ppomsg2 ([10.50.35.27]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 12:07:07 -0600
From: David Borman <David.Borman@quantum.com>
To: Greg Minshall <minshall@acm.org>
Thread-Topic: [tcpm] draft-minshall-nagle
Thread-Index: AQHPgB/LsB02X1NvqUu2hQrvBHJgag==
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 18:07:06 +0000
Message-ID: <08CCAE10-17D6-42BC-9116-033FDBDCB0AF@quantum.com>
References: <76411.1401824441@greg-minshalls-mbp.local>
In-Reply-To: <76411.1401824441@greg-minshalls-mbp.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.65.176.229]
Content-ID: <39CF719C73537448ADD04AB2E402E50F@QUANTUM.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.12.52, 1.0.14, 0.0.0000 definitions=2014-06-04_04:2014-06-04,2014-06-04,1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 kscore.is_bulkscore=1.23401289187086e-13 kscore.compositescore=0 circleOfTrustscore=0 compositescore=0.0734735701287243 urlsuspect_oldscore=0.0734735701287243 suspectscore=0 recipient_domain_to_sender_totalscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 kscore.is_spamscore=0 recipient_to_sender_totalscore=0 recipient_domain_to_sender_domain_totalscore=0 rbsscore=0.0734735701287243 spamscore=0 recipient_to_sender_domain_totalscore=0 urlsuspectscore=0.9 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1406040224
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/Cm6rEpNGUNfMglmMsvu0sSxXFYo
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] draft-minshall-nagle
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 18:07:21 -0000

So, since I’m in the acknowledgement section of the draft, I did some digging to see if I could discover what I contributed.  One message I sent at the time shows the BSD/OS did implement some of these ideas.  You can find it at:
	http://roland.grc.nasa.gov/tcp-impl/list/archive/1498.html

All the previous discussion is in the tcp-impl archives, there were two threads, starting at:

	http://roland.grc.nasa.gov/tcp-impl/list/archive/1475.html
	http://roland.grc.nasa.gov/tcp-impl/list/archive/1743.html

It’s probably worth looking over the previous discussions before rehashing it all over again. :-)

			-David Borman

On Jun 3, 2014, at 2:40 PM, Greg Minshall <minshall@acm.org> wrote:

> Lars, et al.,
> 
> i had heard that the Linux kernel implemented my proposed mods to
> Nagle's algorithm, but i haven't looked at that implementation.  i don't
> have any memory of any similar modifications being released in, e.g.,
> *BSD.  (i did make some mods to FreeBSD, but i don't think i ever
> released them.)  i also don't remember why the draft didn't progress,
> though probably i dropped the ball somewhere.  hope that helps.
> 
> cheers, Greg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this transmission may be confidential. Any disclosure, copying, or further distribution of confidential information is not permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by Quantum. Quantum reserves the right to have electronic communications, including email and attachments, sent across its networks filtered through anti virus and spam software programs and retain such messages in order to comply with applicable data security and retention requirements. Quantum is not responsible for the proper and complete transmission of the substance of this communication or for any delay in its receipt.