Re: [tcpm] alternate IW proposal

FWIW, I like this idea better, with the caveat that the doc needs to 
explain:

	- what does "observing" mean?

	- what is the metric of "breaks"?

Just putting an idea out there, with no metric for repeal or success, is 
asking for trouble.

Joe

On 11/15/2010 9:39 AM, Mark Allman wrote:
>
> Dumb idea:
>
>    http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-allman-tcpm-bump-initcwnd-00.txt
>
> I.e.,
>
>    - Stop waving our hands about where things might break.
>
>    - Be less aggressive than the 10 segment IW proposed by Jerry, et.al.
>
>    - Do something.  And, start observing how it actually works.
>
>    - Get to 10 segments in 3 years.  But, with much less fluffy
>      discussion and hand waving.
>
>    - Don't stop at 10 segments, but go all the way to 15 segments over
>      the course of the next 9 years (which is how long it has been since
>      we last increased the IW).
>
> allman, stirin' the pot
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm