[tcpm] draft-ananth-tcpm-persist-00.txt as a WG document

David Borman <david.borman@windriver.com> Fri, 26 September 2008 19:40 UTC

Return-Path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tcpm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FF93A68A6; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00973A68A6 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.349
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.349 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.250, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ummcCuvpErKb for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.wrs.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152D93A686B for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ALA-MAIL03.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-mail03 [147.11.57.144]) by mail.wrs.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m8QJbssO004421; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:37:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ala-mail06.corp.ad.wrs.com ([147.11.57.147]) by ALA-MAIL03.corp.ad.wrs.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:37:54 -0700
Received: from dab-restive.wrs.com ([192.168.117.73]) by ala-mail06.corp.ad.wrs.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:37:54 -0700
Message-Id: <53797EED-2C93-4E20-AF60-E3C0EF8F85AC@windriver.com>
From: David Borman <david.borman@windriver.com>
To: tcpm@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:37:52 -0500
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Sep 2008 19:37:54.0625 (UTC) FILETIME=[5EF17310:01C9200F]
Cc: "Anantha Ramaiah \(ananth\)" <ananth@cisco.com>, mbashyam@ocarinanetworks.com
Subject: [tcpm] draft-ananth-tcpm-persist-00.txt as a WG document
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

At Dublin a presentation was made on draft-ananth-tcpm- 
persist-00.txt.  Not a lot of people had read the document at the time  
of the presentation, but there didn't seem to be any objections to  
adopting it as a TCPM WG document.

The authors posted a summary to the mailing list, have responded to  
all issues that were raised, and have a new version of the document  
ready for publication.  We (Wes and I) feel that there is support for  
adopting this as a WG document, but as always, we need to verify this  
on the mailing list.  So, if you have any objections to adopting this  
as a WG document, please speak up now.  Also speak up if you support  
adopting it as a WG document.

I'll be the first to say I support adopting this as a WG document.  If  
there are no serious objections, the authors can submit their updated  
version next week and Wes and I will add it to our list of WG documents.

			-David Borman, TCPM WG co-chair

_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm