IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Rechartering TCPM for alternative congestion control algorithms

Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> Tue, 27 January 2015 17:03 UTC

Return-Path: <mallman@icir.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0903C1A8847 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:03:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YSIxe7nLLzly for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:03:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU [192.150.186.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AACC1A8843 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:03:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lawyers.icir.org (envoy.icir.org [192.150.187.30]) by fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (8.12.11.20060614/8.12.11) with ESMTP id t0RH3mJG020351; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:03:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lawyers.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lawyers.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C09285ECB65; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:03:47 -0500 (EST)
To: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
From: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <54C7BF65.7030104@mti-systems.com>
Organization: International Computer Science Institute (ICSI)
Song-of-the-Day: Freeze-Frame
X-URL-0: http://www.icir.org/mallman-files/Document38318.doc
X-URL-1: http://www.icir.org/mallman-files/Document94581.html
X-URL-2: http://www.icir.org/mallman-files/Document93527.pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="--------ma50419-1"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:03:47 -0500
Sender: mallman@icir.org
Message-Id: <20150127170347.C09285ECB65@lawyers.icir.org>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/NreT-fptMkUX53_Dzf4efcl3MfQ>
Cc: "tcpm-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <tcpm-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Rechartering TCPM for alternative congestion control algorithms
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mallman@icir.org
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 17:03:59 -0000

> Either way, reviewing the draft is more important than which
> list's name it happens under, so there's no need to have a
> constitutional crisis over it.

Don't make easy things difficult.  Both directions have valid
arguments.  Someone should decide and we should work on difficult
things.

Sheesh.

allman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email