Re: [tcpm] Presentation slot requests for IETF 108 (online)

"Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de> Fri, 03 July 2020 07:36 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E5A63A0DFC; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 00:36:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hs-esslingen.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WXp9mdclODUG; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 00:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hs-esslingen.de (mail.hs-esslingen.de [134.108.32.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBFF63A0DED; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 00:36:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hs-esslingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9BC125A17; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 09:36:17 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hs-esslingen.de; s=mail; t=1593761777; bh=gpOZXiNI3CRxepQS3pskiQnXbHsHgr8kdKoJoMOSgns=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=PafYAR+X9Faax1o8GIVByKkVHlNPogHnqcn4fF6k5MSH+TuW0VKVlvxA/bUOVUQCr S290QdJ8lrP2INmop1m3MaDGvIAoEIFxJ/4EK4OomsZtQvDmngV5D86LoUguMgr2/n T53HooexzwigXxZPREcOGnx9sTl9t7dwQqq8/Bas=
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.7.1 (20120429) (Debian) at hs-esslingen.de
Received: from mail.hs-esslingen.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hs-esslingen.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cNu8NOGS7uoz; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 09:36:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from rznt8102.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de (rznt8102.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de [134.108.29.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hs-esslingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 09:36:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from RZNT8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de ([169.254.3.171]) by rznt8102.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de ([fe80::f977:d5e6:6b09:56ac%10]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 09:36:16 +0200
From: "Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
CC: "Markus.Amend@telekom.de" <Markus.Amend@telekom.de>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>, "tcpm-chairs@ietf.org" <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [tcpm] Presentation slot requests for IETF 108 (online)
Thread-Index: AdZQQCmoc741dfI0S+mziKOl37MyoQABBo5AAA4+aKAAA93uAAAfcSkg
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 07:36:15 +0000
Message-ID: <6EC6417807D9754DA64F3087E2E2E03E2DC87826@rznt8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de>
References: <6EC6417807D9754DA64F3087E2E2E03E2DC85322@rznt8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de> <202007021820.062IKW9I062065@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
In-Reply-To: <202007021820.062IKW9I062065@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [134.108.48.165]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/RzBVnO3-78iW1h4bCYEqSS57aLM>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Presentation slot requests for IETF 108 (online)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 07:36:23 -0000

Rod,

Tim Wicinski has already mentioned that "update" metadata can be used to keep record of the history.

Also, I believe it is quite common in the IETF to rename I-Ds if they move between WGs. For individual submissions, this is probably not formally required, though.

The advantage of -tcpm- is that it is then more apparent on which list the discussion shall take place. Not all readers of I-Ds are familiar with all IETF internals.

Michael

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rodney W. Grimes <ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
> Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 8:21 PM
> To: Scharf, Michael <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
> Cc: Markus.Amend@telekom.de; tcpm@ietf.org; tcpm-chairs@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [tcpm] Presentation slot requests for IETF 108 (online)
> 
> Michael,
> 	Shouldnt the datatracker entry in its entierity be moved
> to tcpm since tcpm is now taking on the work of the closed mptcp wg?
> That way history of the document is preserved and can be easier
> to research.
> 
> 	I am not sure this is even possible, but loosing the
> provadence of a document because it moved WG's seems problematic.
> 
> Regards,
> Rod
> 
> > Markus,
> >
> > Thanks for the request.
> >
> > It may make sense to resubmit the I-D as -tcpm- if it shall be presented in
> TCPM. Then it shows up in datatracker in the right context.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Markus.Amend@telekom.de <Markus.Amend@telekom.de>
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 9:55 AM
> > > To: Scharf, Michael <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>de>; tcpm@ietf.org
> > > Cc: tcpm-chairs@ietf.org; kangjiao@huawei.com
> > > Subject: RE: Presentation slot requests for IETF 108 (online)
> > >
> > > Dear Michaels, Yoshi
> > >
> > > Since MPTCP WG is closed and TCPM takes care, Jiao and I would like to
> > > present implementation updates (probably also a new draft version -02)
> for
> > >
> > > * draft-amend-mptcp-robe / "Multipath TCP Robust Session
> Establishment"
> > > * Jiao Kang / Markus Amend
> > > * 20min
> > >
> > > Just in case we are not able to update the recent -01 to a -02, is it still
> > > required to move the -01 to TCPM before #108?
> > >
> > > Br
> > >
> > > Markus
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: tcpm <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Scharf, Michael
> > > Sent: Donnerstag, 2. Juli 2020 09:15
> > > To: tcpm@ietf.org
> > > Cc: tcpm-chairs <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>
> > > Subject: [tcpm] Presentation slot requests for IETF 108 (online)
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Given that we had a pretty packed agenda during the virtual interim
> meeting,
> > > the chairs have asked for two slots during IETF 108. This basically implies
> that
> > > we have again the 2:30 hour slot that TCPM used to have for many years.
> > >
> > > According to the draft agenda for IETF 108, TCPM has been scheduled for
> > > Monday Session I (1:40) and Monday Session II (0:50).
> > >
> > > If you are interested in presenting, please let the chairs know until
> > > **Monday 2020-07-13**:
> > >
> > > * Draft name / presentation title
> > > * Presenter
> > > * Total duration (including Q&A)
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Michael (2x) and Yoshi
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > tcpm mailing list
> > > tcpm@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > tcpm mailing list
> > tcpm@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
> >
> 
> --
> Rod Grimes                                                 rgrimes@freebsd.org