Re: [tcpm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-tcpm-urgent-data-00

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Fernando Gont wrote:
...
> So we have to issues:
> 
> * Deprecate recv(2)/MSG_OOB and encourage SO_OOBINLINE. (with which you
> seem to agree)

That sounds like a Unix man page update, not an RFC.

> * Update RFC 793/RFC1122 wrt where the UP points to, to reflect what
> everybody does and has been doing. (with which I don't know whether you
> agree or not).

Either this is an implementation error or it updates our definition of PUSH.

If the former, it can be noted in the next version of the TCP
implementation errors doc. If the latter, it would update 1122 - NOT
793. As Dave noted, 1122 supercedes 793 on this issue.

I don't like the idea of continuing to document implementations that do
not comply with current specs without either stating
	a) this is BAD and should be fixed
	b) this is GOOD and we're changing our spec

FWIW, so far, this looks to me like an implementation error, not a
reason to change the spec.

Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkkIgVYACgkQE5f5cImnZrsmjwCfU0E45TefTK2VfZzdhBeLNkhT
sV4AniB+V8YKrYCiWTSw5wWY1CzLCVma
=v9/G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm