[tcpm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kuehlewind-tcpm-ecn-fallback-00.txt

Brian Trammell <trammell@tik.ee.ethz.ch> Thu, 04 July 2013 12:14 UTC

Return-Path: <trammell@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEEA921F99C0 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jul 2013 05:14:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N7dUAk-DPj1L for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jul 2013 05:14:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch (smtp.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.219]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A9121F9950 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jul 2013 05:14:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39107D94B9 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jul 2013 14:14:18 +0200 (MEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new on smtp.ee.ethz.ch
Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.ee.ethz.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id r8e9cX0JZuFW for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jul 2013 14:14:18 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from pb-10243.ethz.ch (pb-10243.ethz.ch [82.130.102.152]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: briant) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08379D9497 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jul 2013 14:14:18 +0200 (MEST)
From: Brian Trammell <trammell@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 14:14:17 +0200
References: <20130703154032.15474.58799.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <82B14E2A-C7B8-4899-8954-80C66BACFB76@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Subject: [tcpm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kuehlewind-tcpm-ecn-fallback-00.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 12:14:30 -0000

Greetings, all,

We've posted a draft on ECN path probing and fallback, which we'd like to discuss at the TCPM meeting in Berlin. In a recent work [1], we found that though the ECN-readiness of popular webservers has significantly increased even in the last couple of years, there still exist paths on which attempts to use ECN after successful ECN negotiation will cause connection disruption.

This draft proposes an experimental approach to determine at runtime whether a path is usable, by sending segments after connection startup and ECN negotiation with the CE codepoint set, and disabling ECN if all probe segments were lost, on a per-flow or per-destination basis.

Experiments with an implementation of the approach within the Linux kernel are underway; we plan to be able to present initial results in Berlin.

Best regards,

Mirja and Brian

[1] Kuehlewind, M., Neuner, S., and Trammell, B., “On the state of ECN and TCP Options on the Internet”, in Proceedings of the the 2013 Passive and Active Measurement Conference, Hong Kong SAR, China, 19 March 2013.

Begin forwarded message:

> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-kuehlewind-tcpm-ecn-fallback-00.txt
> Date: 3 July 2013 17:40:32 GMT+02:00
> To: Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de>, Brian Trammell <trammell@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-kuehlewind-tcpm-ecn-fallback-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Mirja Kuehlewind and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Filename:	 draft-kuehlewind-tcpm-ecn-fallback
> Revision:	 00
> Title:		 A Mechanism for ECN Path Probing and Fallback
> Creation date:	 2013-07-02
> Group:		 Individual Submission
> Number of pages: 5
> URL:             http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kuehlewind-tcpm-ecn-fallback-00.txt
> Status:          http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kuehlewind-tcpm-ecn-fallback
> Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kuehlewind-tcpm-ecn-fallback-00
> 
> 
> Abstract:
>   Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) is a TCP/IP extension that is
>   widely implemented but hardly used due to the perceived unusablilty
>   of ECN on many paths through the Internet caused by ECN-ignorant
>   routers and middleboxes.  This document specifies an ECN probing and
>   fall-back mechanism in case ECN has be successfully negotiated
>   between two connection endpoints, but might not be usable on the
>   path.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The IETF Secretariat