IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] WGLC: 2581bis

Alfred Hönes <ah@tr-sys.de> Mon, 17 December 2007 00:20 UTC

Return-path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J43j7-0002tA-AT; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 19:20:57 -0500
Received: from tcpm by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J43j6-0002t5-Q0 for tcpm-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 19:20:56 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J43j6-0002sx-G6 for tcpm@ietf.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 19:20:56 -0500
Received: from gateway.tr-sys.de ([213.178.172.147] helo=WOTAN.TR-Sys.de) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J43j3-0005fA-SW for tcpm@ietf.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 19:20:56 -0500
Received: from ZEUS.TR-Sys.de by w. with ESMTP ($Revision: 1.37.109.26 $/16.3) id AA117670802; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 01:20:02 +0100
Received: (from ah@localhost) by z.TR-Sys.de (8.9.3 (PHNE_25183)/8.7.3) id BAA02239; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 01:20:01 +0100 (MEZ)
From: Alfred Hönes <ah@tr-sys.de>
Message-Id: <200712170020.BAA02239@TR-Sys.de>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] WGLC: 2581bis
To: tcpm@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 01:20:01 +0100
X-Mailer: ELM [$Revision: 1.17.214.3 $]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="hp-roman8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:51:35 -0800, Ted Faber wrote:
> ...
>
> Just a reminder: this WGLC ends 21 Dec 2007.
> Please comment if you have an opinion - including ...

I had commented in private communication successively
on previous revisions of 2581bis, and the comments have
been discussed and resolved; hence ...

> an opinion that the draft is publishable.

... IMHO, it is, provided that the remaining minor issues already
raised in comments posted to the list and discussed since WGLC
are getting resolved!

  Alfred.



_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email