Re: [tcpm] WG status for 4/15/2010

Alexander Zimmermann <alexander.zimmermann@nets.rwth-aachen.de> Fri, 16 April 2010 10:28 UTC

Return-Path: <alexander.zimmermann@nets.rwth-aachen.de>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D69B3A69D2 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 03:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.801
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.801 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HELO_MISMATCH_DE=1.448, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87Sq3m5rt6T8 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 03:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta-2.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de (mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.7.73]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39BC3A6967 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 03:28:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Received: from ironport-out-1.rz.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.5.40]) by mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.de (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008)) with ESMTP id <0L0Y000GDT3JD6C0@mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.de> for tcpm@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:28:31 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.52,218,1270418400"; d="sig'?scan'208"; a="53365711"
Received: from relay-auth-2.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de (HELO relay-auth-2) ([134.130.7.79]) by ironport-in-1.rz.rwth-aachen.de with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:28:31 +0200
Received: from miami.nets.rwth-aachen.de ([unknown] [137.226.12.180]) by relay-auth-2.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-3.01 64bit (built Dec 9 2008)) with ESMTPA id <0L0Y00L7CT385E10@relay-auth-2.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de> for tcpm@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:28:31 +0200 (CEST)
Content-type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-17-1048734823
From: Alexander Zimmermann <alexander.zimmermann@nets.rwth-aachen.de>
In-reply-to: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB47E12D167F@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:28:30 +0200
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Message-id: <73D77710-D7C5-4863-8C1A-441CE42AB315@nets.rwth-aachen.de>
References: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB47E12D167F@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
To: "Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]" <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.2.3
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078)
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] WG status for 4/15/2010
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:28:41 -0000

A small correction from me too.

The newest version is:

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-lcd-01.txt

Alex

Am 15.04.2010 um 22:30 schrieb Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]:

> Hello TCPMers, below is a snapshot of the WG status as of
> this week.  There are a few updates following the IETF 77
> meeting.  We're up to 4 documents in the RFC Editor queue,
> 1 ready to go to the IESG, 2 more in WGLC, and there are a
> couple getting close to ready for WGLC.  Then there are a
> number of them that we need to look at and check consensus
> on whether they should become WG documents or not,
> particularly the NewReno proposed modification has been
> floating around for awhile, and hasn't had much feedback
> lately.  If people can focus on the two in WGLC and on the
> NewReno proposal, I think that would be healthy for progress.
> 
> Also, there are draft notes from IETF 77 (thanks to Jamshid
> and Matt for taking notes, any errors are probably mine in
> merging them!).  Vetting these would also be helpful:
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/10mar/minutes/tcpm.txt
> 
> 
> 
> WG Items Nearing RFC Publication
> ================================
> 
> Early-Retransmit
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-early-rexmt-04.txt
> Milestone Target: Experimental in July 2009
> Status: In RFC Editor's queue
> Action: None in TCPM
> 
> ICMP Attacks
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-11.txt
> Milestone Target: Informational in July 2009
> Status: finished IETF LC, with IESG
> Action: None in TCPM
> 
> TCP Authentication Option
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt-10.txt
> Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in April 2009
> Status: In RFC Editor's queue
> Action: None in TCPM
> 
> TCP Authentication Option Crypto
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-ao-crypto-01.txt
> Milestone Target: Proposed Standard with AO spec
> Status: In RFC Editor's queue
> Action: None in TCPM
> 
> 
> 
> WG Items in WGLC or being revised after WGLC
> ============================================
> 
> Urgent Pointer
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-05.txt
> Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in January 2010
> Status: updated after WGLC
> Action: chairs (David) writing PROTO for sending to IESG
> 
> MSS Option
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpmss-02.txt
> Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in July 2009
> Status: WGLC started 8/19, ended 9/8 (extended)
>        2nd WGLC started at IETF 77, and is ended with few comments
> Action: David will check with commenters from first WGLC to see
>        if issues are closed
> 
>        Wes will write PROTO and send to the IESG, after WGLC
>        completes
> 
> Long Connectivity Disruptions
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-lcd-00.txt
> (need to submit WG version)
> Milestone Target: Experimental in October 2010
> Status: In WGLC
> Action: WGLC to last 2 weeks, started on 4/13
> 
> 
> Active WG Items
> ===============
> 
> 1323bis
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-01.txt
> Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in July 2009
> Status: Needs revision
> Action: Revise & WGLC (action with D. Borman)
> 
> TCP Security
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-security-01.txt
> Milestone Target: BCP in August 2010
> Status: outline discussion dying off?  content needs work
> Action: 00-draft / outline has been under active discussion; but not attained
>          very clear consensus
>        WG has begun working on recommendations while still looking for a
>          possible compromise on outline (action with Fernando Gont)
>        progress on recommendations made at IETF 77 needs to be worked into
>          the next version of draft (D. Borman to work w/ Fernando)
> 
> SACK Entry
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-sack-recovery-entry-01.txt
> Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in October 2010
> Action: need WG to read/discuss
>        TBD how this relates to 3517, and if it will update it; authors are
>          to determine how much additional time this might take as a bis
>          document versus standalone
> 
> Clarification of sender behavior in persist condition
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ananth-tcpm-persist-01.txt
> Status: discussed on mailing list and in face-to-face meetings
> Action: authors to submit WG version
>        WG determine what to do with socket option section
>        then WGLC
> 
> 
> Documents Under a Poll to Become WG Items
> =========================================
> 
> Timestamps
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-timestamps-01.txt
> Status: consensus to work on some portions of this, possibly as a part of the
>          1323bis document
> Action: need to determine if the accepted portions can be worked into 1323bis
> 
> 
> Other Proposals Not Yet Decided On
> ==================================
> 
> NewReno Modification
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nishida-newreno-modification-01.txt
> Action: need WG to read/discuss
>        presentation given, document updated, but WG list not yet polled for adoption
> 
> AO NAT
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-touch-tcp-ao-nat-00.txt
> Status: IETF 77 discussion determined this should be Experimental, whether or
>          not it is a WG document; need to ask TCPM list
> Action: need to poll mailing list about path forward
> 
> Increasing TCP's Initial Window
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hkchu-tcpm-initcwnd-00
> Status: presented in Anaheim; lots of interest
>        need to keep discussing; the work is in verifying that this is a good
>          idea, moreso than documenting the change
> Action: WG to continue to discuss
> 
> Computing TCP's Retransmission Timer
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-paxson-tcpm-rfc2988bis-00.txt
> Status: presented briefly at IETF 77, also well-discussed on mailing list
>          earlier and at IETF 75
> Action: need to poll for becoming a WG document
> 
> 
> Older & Expired Documents Discussed
> ===================================
> 
> discussions on Rate-Halving
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-mathis-tcp-ratehalving-00.txt
> Action: mailing list discussion about the history of this, and whether
>        it needs to be revived
> 
> Faster Application Handshakes with SYN/ACK Payloads
> expired draft-agl-tcpm-sadata-01
> Status: expired; not specifically polled for adoption in WG
> 
> 
> Documents Not Adopted by WG
> ===========================
> 
> TCP Option for Transparent Middlebox Discovery
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-knutsen-tcpm-middlebox-discovery-03.txt
> Status: discussed on mailing list and updated in response
>        poll for working group adoption opened on 12/9, responses
>          desired by 12/23
>        decision not to adopt by WG; IESG may allow publication and
>          option number assignment at their discretion, but TCPM does
>          not have consensus to do this work
>        background presented at IETF 77
> 
> 
> 
> Other WG Activities
> ===================
> 
> Errata Review for legacy TCP RFCs:
> 
> RFC0793 (1496)  3.9     Technical       Legacy  Yin Shuming             2008-08-27
> RFC0793 (1561)  3.2     Technical       Legacy  Constantin Hagemeier    2008-10-11
> RFC0793 (1562)  3.3     Technical       Legacy  Constantin Hagemeier    2008-10-11
> RFC0793 (1563)  3.4     Technical       Legacy  Constantin Hagemeier    2008-10-11
> RFC0793 (1564)  3.7     Technical       Legacy  Constantin Hagemeier    2008-10-11
> RFC0793 (1565)  3.8     Technical       Legacy  Constantin Hagemeier    2008-10-11
> RFC0793 (1566)  3.9     Technical       Legacy  Constantin Hagemeier    2008-10-11
> RFC0793 (1567)  3.9     Technical       Legacy  Constantin Hagemeier    2008-10-11
> RFC0793 (1568)  3.9     Technical       Legacy  Constantin Hagemeier    2008-10-11
> RFC0793 (1569)  2.4     Technical       Legacy  Constantin Hagemeier    2008-10-11
> RFC0793 (1570)  2.7     Technical       Legacy  Constantin Hagemeier    2008-10-11
> RFC0793 (1571)  3.1     Technical       Legacy  Constantin Hagemeier    2008-10-11
> RFC0793 (1572)  3.4     Technical       Legacy  Constantin Hagemeier    2008-10-11
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Wes Eddy
> MTI Systems
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm