[tcpm] WG status for 4/15/2010
"Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]" <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov> Thu, 15 April 2010 20:31 UTC
Return-Path: <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DFA83A6801 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:31:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.300, BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aBbmm7mUBNXI for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:31:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndmsnpf02.ndc.nasa.gov (ndmsnpf02.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.0.122]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B223A699D for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndjsppt04.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjsppt04.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.103]) by ndmsnpf02.ndc.nasa.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5709F2C8136 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:30:09 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ndjshub03.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjshub03-pub.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.33]) by ndjsppt04.ndc.nasa.gov (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o3FKU6H8003978 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:30:08 -0500
Received: from NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.4.166]) by ndjshub03.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.4.162]) with mapi; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:30:07 -0500
From: "Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]" <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:30:06 -0500
Thread-Topic: WG status for 4/15/2010
Thread-Index: Acrc2m+lCume96F/Qo+p2SMME58q8Q==
Message-ID: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB47E12D167F@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5, 1.2.40, 4.0.166 definitions=2010-04-15_11:2010-02-06, 2010-04-15, 2010-04-15 signatures=0
Subject: [tcpm] WG status for 4/15/2010
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:31:59 -0000
Hello TCPMers, below is a snapshot of the WG status as of this week. There are a few updates following the IETF 77 meeting. We're up to 4 documents in the RFC Editor queue, 1 ready to go to the IESG, 2 more in WGLC, and there are a couple getting close to ready for WGLC. Then there are a number of them that we need to look at and check consensus on whether they should become WG documents or not, particularly the NewReno proposed modification has been floating around for awhile, and hasn't had much feedback lately. If people can focus on the two in WGLC and on the NewReno proposal, I think that would be healthy for progress. Also, there are draft notes from IETF 77 (thanks to Jamshid and Matt for taking notes, any errors are probably mine in merging them!). Vetting these would also be helpful: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/10mar/minutes/tcpm.txt WG Items Nearing RFC Publication ================================ Early-Retransmit http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-early-rexmt-04.txt Milestone Target: Experimental in July 2009 Status: In RFC Editor's queue Action: None in TCPM ICMP Attacks http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-11.txt Milestone Target: Informational in July 2009 Status: finished IETF LC, with IESG Action: None in TCPM TCP Authentication Option http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt-10.txt Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in April 2009 Status: In RFC Editor's queue Action: None in TCPM TCP Authentication Option Crypto http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-ao-crypto-01.txt Milestone Target: Proposed Standard with AO spec Status: In RFC Editor's queue Action: None in TCPM WG Items in WGLC or being revised after WGLC ============================================ Urgent Pointer http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-05.txt Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in January 2010 Status: updated after WGLC Action: chairs (David) writing PROTO for sending to IESG MSS Option http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpmss-02.txt Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in July 2009 Status: WGLC started 8/19, ended 9/8 (extended) 2nd WGLC started at IETF 77, and is ended with few comments Action: David will check with commenters from first WGLC to see if issues are closed Wes will write PROTO and send to the IESG, after WGLC completes Long Connectivity Disruptions http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-lcd-00.txt (need to submit WG version) Milestone Target: Experimental in October 2010 Status: In WGLC Action: WGLC to last 2 weeks, started on 4/13 Active WG Items =============== 1323bis http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-01.txt Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in July 2009 Status: Needs revision Action: Revise & WGLC (action with D. Borman) TCP Security http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-security-01.txt Milestone Target: BCP in August 2010 Status: outline discussion dying off? content needs work Action: 00-draft / outline has been under active discussion; but not attained very clear consensus WG has begun working on recommendations while still looking for a possible compromise on outline (action with Fernando Gont) progress on recommendations made at IETF 77 needs to be worked into the next version of draft (D. Borman to work w/ Fernando) SACK Entry http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-sack-recovery-entry-01.txt Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in October 2010 Action: need WG to read/discuss TBD how this relates to 3517, and if it will update it; authors are to determine how much additional time this might take as a bis document versus standalone Clarification of sender behavior in persist condition http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ananth-tcpm-persist-01.txt Status: discussed on mailing list and in face-to-face meetings Action: authors to submit WG version WG determine what to do with socket option section then WGLC Documents Under a Poll to Become WG Items ========================================= Timestamps http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-timestamps-01.txt Status: consensus to work on some portions of this, possibly as a part of the 1323bis document Action: need to determine if the accepted portions can be worked into 1323bis Other Proposals Not Yet Decided On ================================== NewReno Modification http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nishida-newreno-modification-01.txt Action: need WG to read/discuss presentation given, document updated, but WG list not yet polled for adoption AO NAT http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-touch-tcp-ao-nat-00.txt Status: IETF 77 discussion determined this should be Experimental, whether or not it is a WG document; need to ask TCPM list Action: need to poll mailing list about path forward Increasing TCP's Initial Window http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hkchu-tcpm-initcwnd-00 Status: presented in Anaheim; lots of interest need to keep discussing; the work is in verifying that this is a good idea, moreso than documenting the change Action: WG to continue to discuss Computing TCP's Retransmission Timer http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-paxson-tcpm-rfc2988bis-00.txt Status: presented briefly at IETF 77, also well-discussed on mailing list earlier and at IETF 75 Action: need to poll for becoming a WG document Older & Expired Documents Discussed =================================== discussions on Rate-Halving http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-mathis-tcp-ratehalving-00.txt Action: mailing list discussion about the history of this, and whether it needs to be revived Faster Application Handshakes with SYN/ACK Payloads expired draft-agl-tcpm-sadata-01 Status: expired; not specifically polled for adoption in WG Documents Not Adopted by WG =========================== TCP Option for Transparent Middlebox Discovery http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-knutsen-tcpm-middlebox-discovery-03.txt Status: discussed on mailing list and updated in response poll for working group adoption opened on 12/9, responses desired by 12/23 decision not to adopt by WG; IESG may allow publication and option number assignment at their discretion, but TCPM does not have consensus to do this work background presented at IETF 77 Other WG Activities =================== Errata Review for legacy TCP RFCs: RFC0793 (1496) 3.9 Technical Legacy Yin Shuming 2008-08-27 RFC0793 (1561) 3.2 Technical Legacy Constantin Hagemeier 2008-10-11 RFC0793 (1562) 3.3 Technical Legacy Constantin Hagemeier 2008-10-11 RFC0793 (1563) 3.4 Technical Legacy Constantin Hagemeier 2008-10-11 RFC0793 (1564) 3.7 Technical Legacy Constantin Hagemeier 2008-10-11 RFC0793 (1565) 3.8 Technical Legacy Constantin Hagemeier 2008-10-11 RFC0793 (1566) 3.9 Technical Legacy Constantin Hagemeier 2008-10-11 RFC0793 (1567) 3.9 Technical Legacy Constantin Hagemeier 2008-10-11 RFC0793 (1568) 3.9 Technical Legacy Constantin Hagemeier 2008-10-11 RFC0793 (1569) 2.4 Technical Legacy Constantin Hagemeier 2008-10-11 RFC0793 (1570) 2.7 Technical Legacy Constantin Hagemeier 2008-10-11 RFC0793 (1571) 3.1 Technical Legacy Constantin Hagemeier 2008-10-11 RFC0793 (1572) 3.4 Technical Legacy Constantin Hagemeier 2008-10-11 -- Wes Eddy MTI Systems
- [tcpm] WG status for 4/15/2010 Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]
- Re: [tcpm] WG status for 4/15/2010 Fernando Gont
- Re: [tcpm] WG status for 4/15/2010 Yoshifumi Nishida
- Re: [tcpm] WG status for 4/15/2010 Alexander Zimmermann