Re: [tcpm] poll for adoption of long connectivity disruptions draft

"Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[Verizon]" <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov> Fri, 18 September 2009 13:35 UTC

Return-Path: <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C096D3A67AD for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.463
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.136, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9UPHKj3ruVaj for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndmsnpf02.ndc.nasa.gov (ndmsnpf02.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.0.122]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC25E3A6885 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndjsppt03.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjsppt03.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.102]) by ndmsnpf02.ndc.nasa.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010BD1480FB for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:36:22 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ndjshub01.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjshub01.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.4.160]) by ndjsppt03.ndc.nasa.gov (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8IDa8Wh032239 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:36:22 -0500
Received: from NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.4.166]) by ndjshub01.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.4.160]) with mapi; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:35:41 -0500
From: "Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[Verizon]" <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>
To: "Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[Verizon]" <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:35:40 -0500
Thread-Topic: poll for adoption of long connectivity disruptions draft
Thread-Index: AcorOkcQoJjUMfz3QWuTzmBHEhBvFwNKiRuA
Message-ID: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB47B65398F8@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
References: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB479B8A30CD@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
In-Reply-To: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB479B8A30CD@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.7400:2.4.4, 1.2.40, 4.0.166 definitions=2009-09-18_07:2009-09-17, 2009-09-18, 2009-09-18 signatures=0
Subject: Re: [tcpm] poll for adoption of long connectivity disruptions draft
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:35:29 -0000

>-----Original Message-----
>From: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tcpm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[Verizon]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 3:28 PM
>
>Hello, the authors of the "Long Connectivity Disruptions" draft:
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zimmermann-tcp-lcd-02.txt
>have given a couple presentations to the WG now and asked if it
>could be considered as an item for the WG for Experimental.  If
>I'm not mistaken, there has been some positive feedback on the
>most recent incarnation, though not a lot, and not really any
>negative feedback that I could see.
>
>As chairs, David and I are asking the WG to voice whether we should:
>
>A) adopt this as a WG item for Experimental
>B) NOT adopt this as a WG item
>C) wait to decide (not ready)


Based on both mailing list feedback which primarily pointed to choice A,
and the discussion at the last 2 meetings, it looks like this should be
added to our milestones.  My guess is that 1 year from now is an
appropriate time to put the milestone at.  The authors can go ahead and
submit a draft-ietf-tcpm-... version when they're ready.

---------------------------
Wes Eddy
Network & Systems Architect
Verizon FNS / NASA GRC
Office: (216) 433-6682
---------------------------