[tcpm] TCP-AO (was: Re: TCPM and draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks)

Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Fri, 19 February 2010 23:16 UTC

Return-Path: <fernando@gont.com.ar>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 257C43A6CED; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:16:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.114
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.114 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.485, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RBIP8nrOsmWe; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:16:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp1.xmundo.net (smtp1.xmundo.net [201.216.232.80]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC1528C0F9; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:16:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from venus.xmundo.net (venus.xmundo.net [201.216.232.56]) by smtp1.xmundo.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2059D6B670F; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:17:57 -0300 (ART)
Received: from [192.168.0.100] (129-130-17-190.fibertel.com.ar [190.17.130.129]) (authenticated bits=0) by venus.xmundo.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1JNHoPZ030485; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:17:51 -0300
Message-ID: <4B7F1C1E.4010605@gont.com.ar>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:17:50 -0300
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
References: <20100218175622.61BB028C2E3@core3.amsl.com> <2002D196-D83C-4B44-870C-8E9A94D2D640@nokia.com> <4B7D8B9F.1010608@piuha.net> <4B7D8F55.90406@piuha.net> <4B7D92EB.7010407@isi.edu> <4B7DE6B7.4080209@gont.com.ar> <4B7ECCA3.5000505@isi.edu> <4B7F114D.6050409@gont.com.ar> <4B7F141E.30808@isi.edu> <4B7F18F9.3030505@gont.com.ar> <4B7F1B0A.304@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4B7F1B0A.304@isi.edu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
OpenPGP: id=D076FFF1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (venus.xmundo.net [201.216.232.56]); Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:17:56 -0300 (ART)
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: [tcpm] TCP-AO (was: Re: TCPM and draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 23:16:08 -0000

Joe Touch wrote:

>>> The text in AO was unchanged since the -00 version (Nov 2007). You
>>> waited until after last call to complain about adding specific calls for
>>> ICMP actions. 
>> Look at this:
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/current/msg04593.html
>>
>> Is June 16th, 2009 what you call last-minute???????
> 
> It was raised as you cite, discussed at the WG meeting in Stockholm, and
> we proceeding with the result from that meeting (see slide 8). 

We proceeded with the result of that meeting? :-) I thought the
mailing-list were important in the IETF process.

Maybe I'm just missing something?

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1