Re: [tcpm] [GROW] How to reuse the tcp model in the BMP model - asking for suggestions

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Wed, 26 October 2022 04:55 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4ECC1522C9; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 21:55:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qI0OxDywlb2l; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 21:55:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x635.google.com (mail-pl1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::635]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05980C1522C1; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 21:55:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x635.google.com with SMTP id c24so12947048pls.9; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 21:55:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RYYIIrjP5dK2uLO37H2fVHMa6/5Vk8zRqFhuUKoJRPI=; b=E2Pfj4NeiIt9yxnSCqBCSk1eyuTOczbE7P0adKlBbVbWU1lXKBx6QbAbXWA3gkeSF4 JawZBLesfDS0fvodSOKfsljC8Jur6HwJgMZYREtNfU1Coy+HgivT+Bwd03jHhGuUAyab kN2aW8mglbzh0np4Gfl7ZHBpL11HiVgAyd+yONhAAxGAIDaFp0MuPJl5pqWFcXNRmr0g d7+rQEa52vR6BTvFuyDqod0jCvMGTlk3lbN31Ov2OfxEu+dinPmHZkv6UJ1sMLQMvpQe x3F9MwNtPqDcEfSwxnaNP9ty3CzoSeZLJGYTps7u7qWDudgoETO70InIhslNF0jq16Wv goyg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RYYIIrjP5dK2uLO37H2fVHMa6/5Vk8zRqFhuUKoJRPI=; b=3CpfsW9PUcucj4bpv3azKyeN/cngfc7wwbQBIEqFhxe1uqmh6zU2HaE4B2uNRcgN+M +GhZzr54tnwe3zhdKdyT4E5mgu/A87ZCQZb/bZNdSic4ASc87RxDbomZB6eKKhK7zxsf Q/6whp3Lc3dyJR4qiXJ2M4Zler0qOOjYWNMzQrXeqiay0kctrHrv+Yfpa+g2NW7JuRDt 3qQG/FIZlGSyj+29D14f8pGdP/vCWsy+MjfQsg1hqHLz9MkJOYr5uGc+SA40u/9UtkvQ CughVdtm+CKAheODzArvI1t1WQpf1d9li+ThB64EexXlmD9aFUcpLEQmuqpNiP1EakKL eoGw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3IhMrmTctI6EDXrRXPdwPLSU3+yJLmy4FUJh+CjNmdPnaTeLxL LVId3vkDDS0mlfjKVNSV9Co=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6pSG62B7Bfyc34d4FocP7vV4vJNfox2x8+0T4DTCmUgwIGDgjMOJXvSasGAYyiwPMWO5VQ4w==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:32cf:b0:186:e114:be9c with SMTP id i15-20020a17090332cf00b00186e114be9cmr42303plr.136.1666760132429; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 21:55:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.186] (c-69-181-169-15.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [69.181.169.15]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 13-20020a63174d000000b0043c7996f7f0sm2062962pgx.58.2022.10.25.21.55.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Oct 2022 21:55:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <CDC1EBBA-73A2-41F0-BE0B-08A798F7358D@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4040B40E-523E-4F19-96D6-CA419DE7D124"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 21:55:30 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CABNhwV0Gzbq=Pto8ssnocGg5RfmDzMANpSRcLwFE_ziJBtFVLA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, Camilo Cardona <camilo@gin.ntt.net>, Michael SCHARF <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>, "draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp.authors@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp.authors@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp@ietf.org>, "grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
To: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
References: <39BBD72C-808D-45CF-B832-9EF786F45F06@gin.ntt.net> <a8e7d4449ded44cd805f2a20f75b14e8@hs-esslingen.de> <7F96BC15-66B6-4F6B-9B68-AC59FAA0FF39@gin.ntt.net> <3577f12509e949a49ba9494c4f9bb1d7@hs-esslingen.de> <20220725181224.GC14067@pfrc.org> <73CA533F-0911-4A4A-9FF2-21377E3185F4@gin.ntt.net> <47bee885617e4694a6735b80aea9d352@hs-esslingen.de> <20220809145355.GA26219@pfrc.org> <3d87ff887dc74f26b011acc31ac967be@hs-esslingen.de> <20220822160754.GA14484@pfrc.org> <C20B8AFF-9C51-4102-8D55-3FD900DE8938@gmail.com> <E2EC0EAB-3F24-426A-A6C7-85BD0961538D@pfrc.org> <e88b57ef02984116bf96da85b606b3bb@hs-esslingen.de> <C5C5ACD6-DF8F-4E61-93C8-73584721B9C4@pfrc.org> <CABNhwV0Gzbq=Pto8ssnocGg5RfmDzMANpSRcLwFE_ziJBtFVLA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/tSqdqIB2q47_dEsWUEa5nkdwyf8>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] [GROW] How to reuse the tcp model in the BMP model - asking for suggestions
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 04:55:37 -0000

Hi Gyan,

The TCP YANG model is in AUTH48 state with MISREF. It will be published as soon as the dependent draft is published.

Cheers.

> On Oct 24, 2022, at 7:40 PM, Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Jeff
> 
> It sounds like everything is addressed in the TCP Yang model so we don’t need new NG TCP model as we had discussed during my IETF 114 presentation.
> 
> Just want to close the loop on that topic.
> 
> Thank you
> 
> Gyan
> 
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 3:08 PM Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org <mailto:jhaas@pfrc.org>> wrote:
> Michael,
> 
> 
>> On Sep 5, 2022, at 4:52 AM, Scharf, Michael <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de <mailto:Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>> wrote:
>> The authors have published version -08 to address feedback from various reviewers, including your one.
>>  
>> As you can see at the page https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp-08 <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp-08>, we added a typedef for MSS and leafs for MSS and PMTUD. Please review this change and let us know if this works for you.
> 
> Those changes address my comments.  Thanks!
> 
>> We have _not_ added further nodes, as the use case is not clear and there has been no specific suggestion how the draft should be updated. As mentioned before, this document does not try to comprehensively model all potential parameters of a TCP stack. 
> 
> It's YANG.  Unlike MIBs, as long as the structure is well-designed, it can be extended later to address deficiencies.
> 
> Thanks for the work.
> 
> -- Jeff
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> GROW@ietf.org <mailto:GROW@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>
> -- 
>  <http://www.verizon.com/>
> Gyan Mishra
> Network Solutions Architect 
> Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <mailto:gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>
> M 301 502-1347
> 
> 


Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com