RE: Satellite Bandwidth Questions
"Brooker, Ralph" <Ralph.Brooker@andrew.com> Tue, 29 December 1998 20:41 UTC
X-Authentication-Warning: assateague-fi.lerc.nasa.gov: listserv set sender to owner-tcpsat@lerc.nasa.gov using -f
Message-Id: <199812291954.OAA21204@assateague-fi.lerc.nasa.gov>
From: "Brooker, Ralph" <Ralph.Brooker@andrew.com>
To: "\"tcpsat@lerc.nasa.gov\" " <tcpsat@lerc.nasa.gov>, "\"Chris Metz\" " <chmetz@cisco.com>
Subject: RE: Satellite Bandwidth Questions
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 14:41:00 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: owner-tcpsat@lerc.nasa.gov
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO
Content-Length: 2485
Lines: 61
Chris, The "GHZ" numbers you mention are shorthand for the allocated band pair (up/down) used by the satellite, and have no direct relationship to the bandwidth of the channel. On "conventional" (geostationary, bent-pipe) satellites, one rents the amount of bandwidth needed to transmit the desired signal(s), typically from 100 kHz up to 36-72 MHz. The bandwidth in kHz of a signal is proportional to the data rate in bps and depends on the type of modulation (BPSK/QPSK) and the parameters of the forward error correction. Signals using band-limited QPSK modulation and Rate 3/4 convolutional encoding plus Reed-Solomon outer block coding require approximately 1.1 Hz per bps. This is usually the best selection of parameters for low BER links (as required for TCP), but in some circumstances, to minimize satellite cost, reduce modem cost, and/or to enable the use of smaller antennas, other parameters might be better, resulting in anywhere from 0.5 to 2 Hz per bps. For a symmetric two-way point-to-point link, multiply by two; for other carrier configurations, add up all the signals needed to form the network. Ralph Brooker Andrew Corp. ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: Satellite Bandwidth Questions Author: "Chris Metz" [SMTP:chmetz@cisco.com] at AOP Date: 12/29/98 10:49 AM Hi- I am studying TCP over Satellite considerations and have reviewed draft-ietf-tcpsat-stand-mech-06.txt. I live in a "bits per second" world in terms of bandwidth I would like to understand how bps relates to the terms used to describe satellite bandwidth. So is there a reference somewhere or good book on satellite basics that can fill in the following terms: Band Uplink (GHZ) Downlink (GHz) Uplink (bps) Downlink (bps) C 6 4 ?? ?? Ku 14 12 ?? ?? Ka 30 20 ?? ?? I suppose I am asking how does one convert MHz and GHz into conventional bandwidth (bps) terminology. This for clearing this up for me and my apologies for the "simpleton" question. Chris Metz Consulting Systems Engineer Cisco Systems email: chmetz@cisco.com phone: 212-714-4207 pager: 800-365-4578
- Satellite Bandwidth Questions Chris Metz
- Re: Satellite Bandwidth Questions Craig Partridge
- Re: Satellite Bandwidth Questions Andreas Voigt
- RE: Satellite Bandwidth Questions Fritz, David A.
- RE: Satellite Bandwidth Questions Schram, Chris
- RE: Satellite Bandwidth Questions Heidi E Anderson
- RE: satellite bandwidth questions William A. Kissick
- RE: Satellite Bandwidth Questions Brooker, Ralph
- RE: Satellite Bandwidth Questions Christopher M. Hudson
- Re: Satellite Bandwidth Questions Lloyd Wood
- RE: Satellite Bandwidth Questions Lloyd Wood
- RE: Satellite Bandwidth Questions Zwart, R.
- Re: Satellite Bandwidth Questions William D Ivancic
- RE: Satellite Bandwidth Questions Ahmed, Masuma