IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] six authors Re: teas-yang-te-types

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Fri, 08 May 2020 11:04 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03EFA3A09ED for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 04:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5EoJR04pavu3 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 04:04:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy5-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy5-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.38.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF79D3A09E7 for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 May 2020 04:04:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmgw15.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.9.0.15]) by gproxy5.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342C3140651 for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 May 2020 05:04:29 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id X0ntj7vbIrO3uX0ntjnwhr; Fri, 08 May 2020 05:04:29 -0600
X-Authority-Reason: nr=8
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=bfZFrtHB c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10:nop_ipv6 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10:nop_charset_1 a=sTwFKg_x9MkA:10:nop_rcvd_month_year a=Vy_oeq2dmq0A:10:endurance_base64_authed_username_1 a=HLvPDLHGFjgA:10:nop_election2020_name_subject a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=voZKSeMjAAAA:8 a=tvcuK8LPKitD8gxM5jQA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10:nop_charset_2 a=-RoEEKskQ1sA:10:nop_election2020_name_body a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22 a=Yz9wTY_ffGCQnEDHKrcv:22 a=9_PflfxPP4jfUBPIDKbT:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=5SUR5UTRJtcuAs/R5m3RCCFSU9unjg9Bb9J1NjT2mfw=; b=UTt1m4cCN89YD480Q8VW21NNir duCBmieZQr25Wc35w4ZwUGV9wN/VKerSCO0MWHC5hVl65HhhC3J/zqqrhoHb0j3povn1ZBZnt0ixt fkp0njRr/NjKXQyuhfsUP7woJ;
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (port=45765 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1jX0ns-003M3c-VV; Fri, 08 May 2020 05:04:29 -0600
To: tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Cc: "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
References: <CAB75xn4UH2cZzNF48EP2L4n7tz=PoK94q2VBs9_wh=1BfTdzEA@mail.gmail.com> <DB7PR07MB5340CB4C7D59B225F7DD93B3A2A40@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <171e96c5ff0.277b.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net> <DB7PR07MB534009175687A6C65355039CA2A50@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <92958112-63d5-f6ab-92d1-ba000d5cf366@labn.net>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 07:04:25 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DB7PR07MB534009175687A6C65355039CA2A50@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-Source-L: Yes
X-Exim-ID: 1jX0ns-003M3c-VV
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: ([IPv6:::1]) [127.0.0.1]:45765
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 13
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/4Lm12TmB3pp9Qs4j606Hy3eCGdE>
Subject: Re: [Teas] six authors Re: teas-yang-te-types
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 11:04:36 -0000

This is an approved document.  For AD approval details you can see 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types/ballot/

Lou

On 5/7/2020 5:23 AM, tom petch wrote:
> Lou
>
> A change of topic and in your capacity as Chair, I note that a number of TEAS YANG I-D have six authors.  Is the AD ok with that?
>
> Tom Petch
> ________________________________________
> From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
> Sent: 06 May 2020 10:58
> To: tom petch; TEAS WG Chairs
> Cc: TEAS WG (teas@ietf.org); draft-teas-yang-te-types@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: teas-yang-te-types
>
> Tom
>
> Nice catch - and thankfully there's still an opportunity to correct it!
>
> Given the tooling infrastructure extracts the modules from the document's
> code sections, I'm not sure anything would actually fail due to this error,
> but the potential failures are certainly not a good thing - sounds like
> there's a new idnits feature here.
>
> Authors,
>
> Can you send the needed editorial changes  to IANA and the RFC Editor as
> well as to the list?
>
> Thank you!
>
> Lou
>
>
> ----------
> On May 6, 2020 5:30:55 AM tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com> wrote:
>
>> Lou
>>
>> I am looking at teas-yang-te-types-13 which is in the RFC-Editor queue and
>> I do not want to believe what I am seeing.
>>
>> The I-D contains two YANG modules and s.1.2 lists the modules and their
>> prefixes and these module names and prefixes appear in s.4; but when I get
>> to IANA Considerations, the prefix names are different.  The formatting is
>> such that the prefix names are well hidden but I cannot make them match the
>> modules.
>>
>> I can see this causing every TEAS YANG module to fail.
>>
>> Whoops.
>>
>> Tom Petch
>> (who now ducks)
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email