Re: [Teas] 答复: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection

prejeeth kaladharan <prejeeth@gmail.com> Tue, 07 March 2017 08:11 UTC

Return-Path: <prejeeth@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E73E129437; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:11:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gQzmXrBb_JpJ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:11:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x234.google.com (mail-qk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6E2F127A90; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:11:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id 1so195130880qkl.3; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:11:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=a/+MlMulTLyofHMgMHQ+hjYQ0MxAIQJem9Bjtp6rjbc=; b=p3LWiDsWqTNtkvzxpj3a0nNWDtt9ZliI7dVyfScBShclXQ2yxMorEb1KHmUuPlXtG1 2DXol9P5sIkBPUTPiVrKq60caLgPJOG9qFUvBeaZQezDowM3/BhnhoYxHiROaVJDvKpV J4yKQVhf3tOJR1XSexc/nYW4xSC42HoW/XKh76GPlbl9ThAN08OfoD9MV86bD7TRuIfH Wied9frR5rFR6W8RjoxMI7mxNBo8dDKJRF3Y9x0c3ATgAjTIgME+tc5mdXDyoyejZzH2 MwAzCQP2RLQYinh0IJdPPBYZHFBofcvUdr1rzL6T03Z7YsJelJTJjTuqry2LUGswtFT0 zveg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=a/+MlMulTLyofHMgMHQ+hjYQ0MxAIQJem9Bjtp6rjbc=; b=oIQN5FFqBDuPNhQ0ZXa0MOjmU2hoB1ey0/ZuDccb2+qkRoEW7mEp25a+C41fAZJzJv XKHGFt4MDQgJjn9jj3/Y+Mqk3D60/e7o6F+vXk2+M3ClbhRQpBwHhrYaSoprelvyBMr/ nqZzdhX3LPmNFRKHOq66Nyjrl7acA1YIpxYlc8BAEMz2czs1vcBajyPgF5ocLi0NyJGd g4PXqlNbSlodx4jhpS4bPqEqL7vcRgRSBv1whPeqJ84itqOzhHkKiLipn2fUj1Ewzjxa OHUzalOFp9+XT2NsnLLguP9mqAgB+G4qbiVfxXUNNbq17/g+M5aJwul2ksHLvwanvDU1 n/Lw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39ks0oCx/ZtOTQBtRAZvAEjXNFi9i0IkCZK3fQ8SYEhCH6tlP2xSZ9kUJ4HpjusBB+/h5VZsDa4oGTVB8g==
X-Received: by 10.200.39.136 with SMTP id w8mr19886624qtw.284.1488874290715; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:11:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.18.235 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:11:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.140.18.235 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:11:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D8DECBB8E@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <CA+YzgTvcQ3pApa2vETgiM81Jt9YtX5WJwebB3qjoKujsZuAsPg@mail.gmail.com> <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D8DECBB8E@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com>
From: prejeeth kaladharan <prejeeth@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 13:41:30 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB81Xf_TsB3Z2xP-X+6Je4V5G7b4bHByR1OTTVUUZgZ3jqk+dg@mail.gmail.com>
To: vishnupavan@gmail.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ffb0836a800054a1f8fb8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/L9sKrZng2S1b4YP6fV9ihzGbNXg>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 09:17:36 -0800
Cc: Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com>, hliu@ciena.com, boris.zhang@telus.com, ningso01@gmail.com, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, lliu@us.fujitsu.com, huanglu@chinamobile.com, "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <tsaad@cisco.com>, teas@ietf.org, liu.cmri@gmail.com, mehmet.toy@verizon.com, mengnan@huawei.com, fengman.xu@verizon.com, lizhenbin@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [Teas] 答复: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 08:11:34 -0000

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft

With Regards,
Prejeeth

On 7 Mar 2017 11:03 a.m., "Lizhenbin" <lizhenbin@huawei.com> wrote:

> No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Zhenbin(Robin)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *发件人:* Vishnu Pavan Beeram [mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com]
> *发送时间:* 2017年3月7日 5:41
> *收件人:* Huaimo Chen; hliu@ciena.com; Tarek Saad (tsaad);
> fengman.xu@verizon.com; huanglu@chinamobile.com; ningso01@gmail.com;
> mehmet.toy@verizon.com; lliu@us.fujitsu.com; Lizhenbin;
> boris.zhang@telus.com; Mengnan; prejeeth@gmail.com; liu.cmri@gmail.com
> *抄送:* teas@ietf.org; TEAS WG Chairs
> *主题:* Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection
>
>
>
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> As part of the preparation for WG Last Call
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
>
> Please state either:
>
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
> TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thank you,
> Pavan and Lou
>
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
>