Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection

Zhiheng Liu <liu.cmri@gmail.com> Wed, 08 March 2017 17:04 UTC

Return-Path: <liu.cmri@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A58C129609; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 09:04:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EPc7Gc2wMZ6v; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 09:04:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x244.google.com (mail-qk0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F4061294D0; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 09:04:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x244.google.com with SMTP id v125so12738984qkh.1; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 09:04:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=K0sH2WNVlELlysmbhTKpZquwO9AQWGqbd4fJkXyLbMg=; b=ZlEPCsxhne0fVJmCFbHAuAY8rKHUQKbs6/XZhsIDJJAF+Zi0CMQuGR1WtVLk6gScOt WnQ82VynR4j+e6EKIUVZ3RyKTI3jutrtvy4Q/2d50QnKAP9RWhuKeCGFwdGPFpRAI9we qSwLgpS9+ku+j7rQuPGLTv9nRX0Tq2MhmyRRkDSnTVD4ddS976Kya3odR3x1iAfhgKu0 wman5e/h33Wum8c1XJNp8sQV2LTCSjXg4mx49WB4V5D65MzWdiGZKh+7MYTk5TKXmKoY M0A0RqL2Ih4PxBsjRyEH6qMJb3mCEDHjWXdKfMPKH+s4qRNyQrcOadcOPZEOiveyplWf akiw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=K0sH2WNVlELlysmbhTKpZquwO9AQWGqbd4fJkXyLbMg=; b=Q6+bUm5ZnFmESVzZuwWZTATwt43ecO1xfObJgrnBnzW9F2Wzn2iCP3anaSE2jZUd6h jAaNrjwReb4YQTkqj+FIfSA5bRmW3xQutczthLzwKzH/WqC0825BQbuLUHylWKgEAiu6 /UBHvyOlASm4es8S9twCvQsCowhdPFkHdSWJDY5OA94L7IyWOB/gXfwsESIunA3xuzxm 1MLp0uL0ozWMpDh8KVcMJHryFMtpo5tlM5MpMLtIz0tmpXMRnZKafwkMinf6gcvYJdPG HZHaahU6EbD8waS5E9wtXM0e/70Y6Jjq+HaDoqM4gSkLnK4yfAMqW9T5dPf5R5BZb0iP cC8w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39m9/r2CY5y3N3Rh0hP9NMuy/2mdTynJBS55DxCtUd1Q5xw1TlpV7KBr1JssDZz21A==
X-Received: by 10.200.49.76 with SMTP id h12mr8657818qtb.44.1488992674396; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 09:04:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dyn103189.cc.lehigh.edu (dyn103189.cc.lehigh.edu. [128.180.103.189]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z42sm2469233qtb.20.2017.03.08.09.04.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Mar 2017 09:04:33 -0800 (PST)
From: Zhiheng Liu <liu.cmri@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <FDDF2933-C5BD-4670-A6DA-0CE953CAFB31@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8E2915D2-E0F2-454E-A260-64AFEAC7FFEE"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 12:04:32 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTvcQ3pApa2vETgiM81Jt9YtX5WJwebB3qjoKujsZuAsPg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
References: <CA+YzgTvcQ3pApa2vETgiM81Jt9YtX5WJwebB3qjoKujsZuAsPg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/n__2-YbFOY7eAHtnTLvyK7Ukl9s>
Cc: Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com>, boris.zhang@telus.com, ningso01@gmail.com, lliu@us.fujitsu.com, 黄璐 <huanglu@chinamobile.com>, hliu@ciena.com, "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <tsaad@cisco.com>, mehmet.toy@verizon.com, prejeeth@gmail.com, mengnan@huawei.com, fengman.xu@verizon.com, lizhenbin@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 17:04:37 -0000

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Vic Liu(Zhiheng)



> On Mar 6, 2017, at 4:40 PM, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
> 
> As part of the preparation for WG Last Call
> 
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
> 
> Please state either:
> 
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> 
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
> 
> If yes to the above, please state either:
> 
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> 
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
> TO LINES.
> 
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty>.
> 
> Thank you,
> Pavan and Lou
> 
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.