IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] [E] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection

mehmet.toy@verizon.com Tue, 07 March 2017 00:33 UTC

Return-Path: <mehmet.toy@verizon.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E68129532; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:33:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=verizon.com header.b=PPmeEZAK; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=verizon.com header.b=SxndxT1z
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mHYbRVYQQJ62; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:33:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omzsmtpe03.verizonbusiness.com (omzsmtpe03.verizonbusiness.com [199.249.25.208]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E28212941C; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:33:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=verizon.com; i=@verizon.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1488846817; x=1520382817; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=fTdnHBuvCjasOETJy4HDjFVPN0g9qzdVCg1sFHqnMZw=; b=PPmeEZAK3z7lMdaMLY9Q3RR2n55ZmjxOhMhpu32BqyMq1c0z0ILLWwsz qBZjtiWQxfJ7cq3NgkHp0KWfF6rhDn6t9YZy2zwJl8rTle3C82FG6CTDS sinaagi5OrvshGadUKpgT3KmOi7N4jRCc+JH6D72+WigBQOYU+eZe4Rae w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false
Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi03.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.145]) by omzsmtpe03.verizonbusiness.com with ESMTP; 07 Mar 2017 00:33:36 +0000
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,256,1484006400"; d="scan'208,217";a="305978433"
Received: from rogue-10-255-0-101.rogue.vzwcorp.com (HELO Genesis.verizonwireless.com) ([10.255.0.101]) by fldsmtpi03.verizon.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 07 Mar 2017 00:33:04 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=verizon.com; i=@verizon.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1488846785; x=1520382785; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=fTdnHBuvCjasOETJy4HDjFVPN0g9qzdVCg1sFHqnMZw=; b=SxndxT1zdLwVxFlfQa+g4jJiXj0+n8HUsV9XmqY/g9UKXU/mVwSi1fFc iRK1Sxr2o8TyA8TLH8p1AaYonbfj1i4xlKnwod93S3C50aC1iOD9HGvU3 /Lyd6fpGgzN1AGty5srUYL3nB4TYGkAY1t27mDHguBnCPAU2S7p2Ol9Fo Y=;
Received: from unknown (HELO mercury.verizonwireless.com) ([10.255.240.25]) by Genesis.verizonwireless.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 06 Mar 2017 16:33:03 -0800
From: mehmet.toy@verizon.com
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com>, "hliu@ciena.com" <hliu@ciena.com>, "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <tsaad@cisco.com>, fengman.xu@verizon.com, "huanglu@chinamobile.com" <huanglu@chinamobile.com>, "ningso01@gmail.com" <ningso01@gmail.com>, "lliu@us.fujitsu.com" <lliu@us.fujitsu.com>, "lizhenbin@huawei.com" <lizhenbin@huawei.com>, "boris.zhang@telus.com" <boris.zhang@telus.com>, "mengnan@huawei.com" <mengnan@huawei.com>, "prejeeth@gmail.com" <prejeeth@gmail.com>, "liu.cmri@gmail.com" <liu.cmri@gmail.com>
X-Host: discovery.odc.vzwcorp.com
Received: from nyora1hub002.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com ([10.170.34.217]) by mercury.verizonwireless.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 07 Mar 2017 00:33:02 +0000
Received: from OMZP1LUMXCA19.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com (144.8.22.197) by NYORA1HUB002.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com (10.170.34.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.406.0; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 19:33:02 -0500
Received: from OMZP1LUMXCA14.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com (144.8.22.189) by OMZP1LUMXCA19.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com (144.8.22.197) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 18:33:00 -0600
Received: from OMZP1LUMXCA14.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com ([144.8.22.189]) by OMZP1LUMXCA14.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com ([144.8.22.189]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 18:33:00 -0600
Thread-Topic: [E] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection
Thread-Index: AQHSlsJV1k+R2Q764k6ssm503Lf5/qGIhyMg
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:33:00 +0000
Message-ID: <1a5f0176e35d4768b807e20383962370@OMZP1LUMXCA14.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com>
References: <CA+YzgTvcQ3pApa2vETgiM81Jt9YtX5WJwebB3qjoKujsZuAsPg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTvcQ3pApa2vETgiM81Jt9YtX5WJwebB3qjoKujsZuAsPg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.144.60.250]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1a5f0176e35d4768b807e20383962370OMZP1LUMXCA14uswinadvzw_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/z3wURUCK4UosuecI3FmBO7siI7c>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Teas] [E] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:33:40 -0000



No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
Mehmet

From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram [mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 4:41 PM
To: Huaimo Chen; hliu@ciena.com; Tarek Saad (tsaad); Xu, Fengman; huanglu@chinamobile.com; ningso01@gmail.com; Toy, Mehmet; lliu@us.fujitsu.com; lizhenbin@huawei.com; boris.zhang@telus.com; mengnan@huawei.com; prejeeth@gmail.com; liu.cmri@gmail.com
Cc: teas@ietf.org; TEAS WG Chairs
Subject: [E] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for WG Last Call

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
Pavan and Lou

PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email