IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] WG I-D Status

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 23 April 2020 03:14 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66AD53A11FD; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wPqpuz0rndq9; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd31.google.com (mail-io1-xd31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9680C3A1201; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd31.google.com with SMTP id u11so4885591iow.4; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=aAuuXi3CyGPZVpqR72DU+TPBvLePuRXgsTIeGNMM75I=; b=HEp+2K9ZvGBcaHeAFOEyf6ORAsp0QTrSP7BMpeAoTCsToNA1+nCpmWh03h5GSzTgZ/ 28xgYT4jthQztXLDPi40VktPDVVXAIO6kEyneu47odCIhpegdMqSzdAsP3J7uDmk3hyP cDU5ItxZ4i7QMec8BdFEIQMQJUxPSJDW21hp8mRZ/YR4KA4a5wpBP+9bTjg0RhdhMqo6 k9bY32RhprrRYY2iQ1kJpSe68x7EHJflj3qCsqKC7N3FM0jU87W+5NZxxbh/f7HcTaa9 o7dVT++kQ6JdHvGc93efXcpZGlAkjPZJSznBsk6+zmMoQ0mFEpSCsmc9dV8h5gXntnAy h4FA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aAuuXi3CyGPZVpqR72DU+TPBvLePuRXgsTIeGNMM75I=; b=OEYQBExLj7WE0ya4kVK7ML5Hi7V4fCZoXxl50lubUsl7jSOycHC18YBB6brw6DesIF UYMuOEolcWuR1rJNbRVEFFqg2Y7vmNm2Z6W15yWqr++67IOeMj8+OkonNCc1ntAqNdLH 9db3JDkTqIXFIkWCw04QFdFU3ALiSHHxMhH9H2R7y3kWO2nTuCMlD84Nt57SSPP1tCVU DPCPQ4QMGWSS3C+3Os4HvNto4UKjruaeg9ajGRSSgZLGO7wb428G7rULiHO3E5JDabnB /I3b4hx/EK1W3OVUaBCKZ0Cjzunrbjt8t7Q+63QvBGgC79/2LWQ4vkxrIDlmOLqNf/Jb DsGA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYQSrQDkwxypkpecCE3iukrC9OYZm0VO6mQEJVA7IK7p6lXTNU8 zp2X4iLsVuU57HTaA2wQBi6DlqKLLdRcdonSOS3Zk/GmoTA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJCsLEO/bm7D6hNXx07VMdBmUsVs89Rwcgf+o98iC4QuaKVCtFqVBYHlwOcvrW2iTkgOguyx0hOIGbLPPVvHS4=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:2a47:: with SMTP id w68mr1386944jaw.76.1587611662502; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:14:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAB75xn78kAB3e2q+MNLtdskV9dmuBYP4iUhsHMJ_gQCq0AOXYA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+YzgTsGuosk0UzfZse9LvpOE6qiu0Sd3TP2KDsKZG_+ERYpUQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTsGuosk0UzfZse9LvpOE6qiu0Sd3TP2KDsKZG_+ERYpUQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:43:46 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn4a38D1TzmF4BkQKS=B-dKY6Hg03vf52NxR4wKM_JzrOQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "TEAS WG (teas@ietf.org)" <teas@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/P4XawHAE_8UYyWxe2al2sfIRJaY>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG I-D Status
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 03:14:25 -0000

Hi Pavan,

On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 8:34 AM Vishnu Pavan Beeram
<vishnupavan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dhruv, Hi!
>
> Thanks for the status updates!
> Please do send out a separate email to the list discussing the latest changes to the TE Service-Mapping Yang model (mapping to the NM models).

I plan to do that after the interim meeting.

> Has there been any coordination/interaction with the authors of the L3/L2 NM models?

Yes, this has been done after discussions with Oscar/Samier and the
update has been reviewed by them.

Best regards & stay safe,
- Dhruv

>
> Regards,
> -Pavan
>
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 1:38 AM Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Chairs, WG,
>>
>> Please find the status -
>>
>> ==
>>
>> A Yang Data Model for VN Operation (draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-08)
>> Updates:
>>   Mainly YANG guidelines update
>>   All earlier issues resolved
>> Next Steps:
>>   Yang Doctors Review
>>
>> ==
>>
>> YANG models for VN/TE Performance Monitoring Telemetry and Scaling
>> Intent Autonomics (draft-ietf-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics-02)
>> Updates:
>>   Mainly YANG guidelines update
>> Next Step:
>>   Solicit more reviews
>>
>> ==
>>
>> Traffic Engineering (TE) and Service Mapping Yang Model
>> (draft-ietf-teas-te-service-mapping-yang-03)
>> Updates:
>>   Mapping to Network Yang Models added (L3NM and L2NM)
>>   YANG guidelines update
>> Question to the WG:
>>   Is this the right place to include mapping to the network model as well?
>>
>> ==
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Dhruv
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Teas mailing list
>> Teas@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email