[Teas] 答复: WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enhanced-vpn-03

["Aijun Wang" <[e-mail]>]

Yes/Support.

 

I think this documents gives us the overall description/analysis about the gap between the requirements of VPN+ service and the existing technologies and solution.

 

My  concern are the followings:

1) In section https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dong-teas-enhanced-vpn-03#section-4.6.2, it is said :”This section discusses how the features of ACTN can fulfill the enhanced VPN requirements described earlier in this document.”. 

    We need further analysis about the implementation/deployment/protocol extension etc. that ACTN has not covered.

2) We should focus on the packet network, that is to say, the  “Pragmatic Isolation” or dynamic isolations/assurances for enhanced VPN services. 

 

Best Regards.

 

Aijun Wang

Network R&D and Operation Support Department

China Telecom Corporation Limited Beijing Research Institute,Beijing, China.

 

发件人: Vishnu Pavan Beeram [mailto:[e-mail]] 
发送时间: 2018年12月17日 15:27
收件人: TEAS WG
抄送: TEAS WG Chairs
主题: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enhanced-vpn-03

 

All,

This is start of a *three* week poll on making
draft-dong-teas-enhanced-vpn a TEAS working group document.
Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not
support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the
document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd
like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.

The poll ends Jan 7th 2019 (extra week to account for the holidays).

Thanks,
Pavan and Lou