IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-dong-teas-nrp-scalability-02

"Wubo (lana)" <lana.wubo@huawei.com> Fri, 01 July 2022 09:16 UTC

Return-Path: <lana.wubo@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B72C14CF0F; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 02:16:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ebAdm-mBLA4P; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 02:16:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF392C14CF08; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 02:16:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml711-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4LZ8bm5kqVz67xvP; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 17:12:20 +0800 (CST)
Received: from kwepemi100013.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.136) by fraeml711-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 11:16:25 +0200
Received: from kwepemi500014.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.232) by kwepemi100013.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.136) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 17:16:24 +0800
Received: from kwepemi500014.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.232]) by kwepemi500014.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.232]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.024; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 17:16:24 +0800
From: "Wubo (lana)" <lana.wubo@huawei.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
CC: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-dong-teas-nrp-scalability-02
Thread-Index: AQHYgXfNqbygXCP3DE20IHbvKzjpG61fzGlA
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2022 09:16:24 +0000
Message-ID: <0bc901eca65844099c93f25f6e9d28af@huawei.com>
References: <d4b605bb-2391-a6e4-bcad-475be66a029d@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <d4b605bb-2391-a6e4-bcad-475be66a029d@labn.net>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.136.98.73]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/R2SiJBCmyvMIuJCp-Cq5FFbgGsQ>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-dong-teas-nrp-scalability-02
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2022 09:16:34 -0000

Hi WG, 

I have read the draft and support the WG adoption.

I think this draft complement the NS framework and draft-ietf-teas-ns-ip-mpls well.
The NS framework introduces NRP, and draft-ietf-teas-ns-ip-mpls says NRP can be further classified into resource partitions in the control plane, the data plane, or a combination of the two. This draft describes the considerations and possible optimizations of the control plane and data plane of NRP for better scalability, which is useful for the NRP solution design. And IMO it would be helpful for draft-ietf-teas-ns-ip-mpls to refer to this document for the scalability considerations.

Thanks,
Bo

-----Original Message-----
From: Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2022 7:47 PM
To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-dong-teas-nrp-scalability-02

Hello,

This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-teas-nrp-scalability/

Please note that IPR has been disclosed on this document:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-dong-teas-nrp-scalability

Please voice your support or objections to adoption on the list by the end of the day (any time zone) July 1.

Thank you,
Lou (as Co-chair)

_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email