[Teas] 答复: <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-04> - Review

Zhenghaomian <zhenghaomian@huawei.com> Sun, 10 July 2016 13:08 UTC

Return-Path: <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2086112D112; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 06:08:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.507
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S_LObyajTith; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 06:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com []) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BC8212D0EC; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 06:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (EHLO lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com) ([]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CNL13877; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 13:08:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEMA411-HUB.china.huawei.com ( by lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 14:08:28 +0100
Received: from SZXEMA504-MBX.china.huawei.com ([]) by szxema411-hub.china.huawei.com ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:08:19 +0800
From: Zhenghaomian <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-04> - Review
Thread-Index: AQHR2h78CNDDlfiTa0qJve5dp1fb36ARo1ZQ
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 13:08:19 +0000
Message-ID: <E0C26CAA2504C84093A49B2CAC3261A438D46C5D@SZXEMA504-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <CA+YzgTs0VNW57aTnqtkhz_718fc3_jrgdeY+jb7ZniPTsKwr3A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTs0VNW57aTnqtkhz_718fc3_jrgdeY+jb7ZniPTsKwr3A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E0C26CAA2504C84093A49B2CAC3261A438D46C5DSZXEMA504MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090201.578248CD.0065, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 9dd4dcf36244206a456a66af601dec25
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/Uv2QL9MD9mhQdu3cR3SCtjuYPR4>
Subject: [Teas] 答复: <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-04> - Review
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 13:08:34 -0000

Hi, Pavan,

Thanks for the review.

We will meet with the authors and address the comments in the next version☺

Best wishes,

发件人: Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Vishnu Pavan Beeram
发送时间: 2016年7月10日 4:18
收件人: draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc@ietf.org; teas@ietf.org
主题: [Teas] <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-04> - Review

Authors, Hi!

I did a quick review of the current version of <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc>.

Couple of nits. Please see if you can take care of those in the next revision.

- There are quite a few places in the draft where the term “transport networks” is used. In some places it appears to imply “transport networks of all types”, while in other places (like in Section 3) it means “non packet-based transport networks”. Please see if you can make the usage seem consistent (might have to make some edits in Section 3).

- Update the list of authors/editors in the first page as per the guidance provided in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7322#section-4.1. (please see if you can adhere to the "5 authors" limit; as an alternative, consider having just one or two editors with others listed in the Contributors/Acknowledgements section)