Re: [Teas] <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-04> - Review

"Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <> Tue, 16 August 2016 11:26 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F5012D777; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 04:26:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.768
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.768 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bAc457GVlPCK; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 04:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2245012B034; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 04:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=8600; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1471346760; x=1472556360; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=eQ4GnwgHIa/Tgns2W05HmFz6Cw1EN0IQ8wZeSWa/PJU=; b=O6fB6GM9qi6uR1yDLuVUT2dtYBDQNKJpqo6L5qsJqCWWq09ycsbOELUp vCxPrrzltYW1qQO279T38XOWXbYWdmuPOTGJa5TUZmtXse+Vn0C7Sjg7h rRjPRWXAz6z51sa0f71PKH6B3IKVC/d4Mn/vkc4Yw+TeVl2MR/iay+TYx c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,529,1464652800"; d="scan'208,217";a="311452793"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 16 Aug 2016 11:25:58 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7GBPw40028707 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:25:58 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 06:25:58 -0500
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 06:25:58 -0500
From: "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <>
To: "" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-04> - Review
Thread-Index: AQHR2342UzI5ddfwrkyMD5eXHlVTRKBIySWAgALyhgA=
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:25:57 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D3D86E2FA334Crgandhiciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [Teas] <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-04> - Review
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:26:02 -0000

Hi Pavan,

Thank you for reviewing the document and providing comments.

We have uploaded a new revision that addresses your comments. Please see below with <RG> for replies.

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:

 A diff from the previous version is available at:

At this time, there are no open issues for this document and we believe the document is ready for WG LC.

Rakesh (On behalf of the authors and contributors)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <<>>
Date: Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 4:17 PM
Subject: <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-04> - Review
To:<>, "<>" <<>>

Authors, Hi!

I did a quick review of the current version of <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc>.

Couple of nits. Please see if you can take care of those in the next revision.

- There are quite a few places in the draft where the term "transport networks" is used. In some places it appears to imply "transport networks of all types", while in other places (like in Section 3) it means "non packet-based transport networks". Please see if you can make the usage seem consistent (might have to make some edits in Section 3).

<RG> Document updated with "non-packet transport networks".

- Update the list of authors/editors in the first page as per the guidance provided in (please see if you can adhere to the "5 authors" limit; as an alternative, consider having just one or two editors with others listed in the Contributors/Acknowledgements section)

<RG> Document updated to address this.