Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-10

[[e-mail]]

Hi Pavan, all,

 

I would suggest addressing the AC issue raised by Med, but other than that I
believe the document is ready to move forward.

 

If you’re looking for implementation feedbacks, an EANTC interop event was
run yesterday at the MPLS world congress (based on an earlier version of the
draft).

 



 

Cheers

Daniele  

 

 

From: Teas <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of [e-mail]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2024 5:24 PM
To: TEAS WG ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG Last Call:
draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-10

 

Hi all, 

 

Please find below my comments based on -10 (with appendix):

 

*	pdf:
https://github.com/boucadair/IETF-Drafts-Reviews/blob/master/2024/draft-ietf
-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-10-rev%20Med.pdf
*	Doc:
https://github.com/boucadair/IETF-Drafts-Reviews/raw/master/2024/draft-ietf-
teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-10-rev%20Med.doc 

 

Most of the remaining comments are minor. The only major comment is that now
that the AC specs are stable (WGLCed in opsawg), I suggest that we use the
typedefs defined there for AC referencing and also reusing the rate-limit
groupings defined their. 

 

Please note that because “min-elements 2” is used under “list sdp”, example
instances must always include sdp elements; otherwise the instance is
invalid. Some of the examples are broken; I provided fixes when needed, but
please double check on your side.

 

I’m not reiterating the comments about the appendix and the one forwarded
from OPSAWG:

 

*	Appendix:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/W6yB9cnyNnRc4JR5j2Fsx0YmKfY/
*	Mahesh comment:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/Xg5uZ8iOYiFZ2OS-wXuqmERnCqA/ 

 

The document is ready to move forward once these comments are addressed.

 

Cheers,

Med

 

De : Teas <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> > De la part
de Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Envoyé : vendredi 12 avril 2024 10:38
À : TEAS WG <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Cc : TEAS WG Chairs <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Objet : [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-10

 

All,

This starts a two-week working group last call on

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang
/

 

The working group last call ends on April 26th 2024.

Please send your comments to the working group mailing list.

Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document
and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome!
This is useful and important, even from authors.

 

Note: There is IPR disclosed for this document -

 
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-teas-ie
tf-network-slice-nbi-yang>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-teas-iet
f-network-slice-nbi-yang


 

Thank you,
Pavan, Lou and Oscar

____________________________________________________________________________
________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu
ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
falsifie. Merci.
 
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.