IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-26: (with COMMENT)

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 07 August 2023 09:47 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3181C15155E; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 02:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.807
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.807 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=olddog.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O9BRj_pYPiWY; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 02:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79BF6C1516E0; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 02:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (vs4.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.122]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 3779ldPr017580; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 10:47:39 +0100
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28B64604A; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 10:47:38 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D5046043; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 10:47:38 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs4.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 10:47:38 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (82-69-109-75.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.109.75]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 3779lc5j004733 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Aug 2023 10:47:38 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Erik Kline' <ek.ietf@gmail.com>, 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis@ietf.org, teas-chairs@ietf.org, teas@ietf.org, vishnupavan@gmail.com
References: <169138039737.2130.1672925506318857465@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <169138039737.2130.1672925506318857465@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2023 10:47:38 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <09e601d9c914$33c64120$9b52c360$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AQIxw5gNuoKMKzRnLpx+1/Fl/f+y4q8uli/g
X-Originating-IP: 82.69.109.75
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=olddog.co.uk; h=reply-to :from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= 20221128; bh=3gpG9q/YVFv0wrdDq5DA5rB0ktFBMg7swn3C3uvXR9A=; b=eyL UvQEwl9p4xSrLeJzKX900auxn2L/t/nCaKrJwbcIJd0c1f3+YGyklV8U9VbSlk28 QbpCkaBFAmJRayU/mituAd3nRFtieNwEdrHJbRER5J35hMsjrB+uux1u0Nnp4pfJ qxzH/6tJqhpWeQOjfeJzVuq5XewnC68acUt8ww9bamXm73jjWdboKOdEJ+sAN/lh BE/eqAOGyL7pRoBFRjX+sApQiwq7OkhH/3dp9T6W0BRaS+JR4Ntawdvf4lYagfjF KeIAgzXYettQBzf3ZeQssNEW37zCpnJ+XwPEB0WlHcAnRXPFzzRvhSepa0Xif6T3 u8H5aEYjl/fEOQLwvCw==
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-27798.006
X-TM-AS-Result: No--2.478-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--2.478-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-27798.006
X-TMASE-Result: 10--2.478000-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: pBwXUM+nCwvxIbpQ8BhdbI61Z+HJnvsO6y37p6CPIsCqvcIF1TcLYMlj iIOMoIK6GjCmeincfvpSFvB1f5YvKOjSAqgEFHPPDZs/KgmqdkvqtOCMCMzOYZsoi2XrUn/JyeM tMD9QOgAGJ4JQFnQmGyiNG0gFH6RwavP8b9lJtWr6C0ePs7A07RjOlt1Pi5531Vlkp9L6GUvfAx nQFN0aV3hjxzGmX0WgLFxaVqASNSk=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/duV96pmkobnSs1wRsrdec-9U1VU>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-26: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2023 09:47:47 -0000

Hi Erik,

Thanks for reading

> ## Nits
>
> ### S5.1.3.3
>
> * "an ingress LSRs and an egress LSRs"
>
>   Maybe strike the two "an"s.

I think they should both be singular.

> ### S5.1.3.4
>
> * "is comprised of" -> composed?

A fine point. It either "comprises" or it is "composed of"

Cheers,
Adrian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email