[Teas] Jim Guichard's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-26: (with COMMENT)

[Jim Guichard via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Jim Guichard has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-26: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you to the author and WG for a nicely written document! Just a few minor
nits:

- Section 1.4 Terminology: "Egress node:" s/with/which/

- Section 1.4 Terminology: "Ingress node:" s/with/which/

- Section 5.1.1.1 - expand RSVP on first use which is the 2nd paragraph not the
3rd paragraph.

- Section 5.1.1.5 - "The DetNet service sub-layer provides a set of Packet
Replication, Elimination, and Ordering Functions (PREOF) functions.." - Remove
redundant 'functions' text.

- Section 5.1.2.2 - "ACTN facilitates composed, multi-domain connections and
provides them to the user.". Should 'composed' be 'composite'?

- Section 5.1.3.3 - Expand 'LDP' on first use.