Re: [Teas] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-15: (with COMMENT)

Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn> Tue, 02 February 2021 01:00 UTC

Return-Path: <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839003A1620; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 17:00:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xIFHsWwVLnyH; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 17:00:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-m17638.qiye.163.com (mail-m17638.qiye.163.com [59.111.176.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09B143A1621; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 17:00:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DESKTOP2IOH5QC (unknown [219.142.69.75]) by mail-m17638.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTPA id AC94A1C00F7; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:00:01 +0800 (CST)
From: "Aijun Wang" <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
To: "'Rob Wilton \(rwilton\)'" <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "'The IESG'" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: <draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip@ietf.org>, <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, <teas@ietf.org>, <lberger@labn.net>
References: <161122320617.9473.15706741821701705911@ietfa.amsl.com> <006a01d6f05d$5fadf8b0$1f09ea10$@tsinghua.org.cn> <MN2PR11MB4366586888EEA4E5E95E3366B5A09@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <00be01d6f2c7$81342420$839c6c60$@tsinghua.org.cn> <MN2PR11MB4366BD22AE742F4A223FCED6B5B69@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB4366BD22AE742F4A223FCED6B5B69@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 08:59:59 +0800
Message-ID: <004c01d6f8fe$bb9341e0$32b9c5a0$@tsinghua.org.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQGrQPRBSEzVeu9Pb6FhyXQkF2bdzgI7M30FAq6vyOIDCdMi2QEdEL7vqlL1IAA=
Content-Language: zh-cn
X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUtXWQgYFAkeWUFZS1VLWVdZKFlBSkxLS0o3V1ktWUFJV1 kPCRoVCBIfWUFZSB9MH0tOT0hPHU8fVkpNSklJSUxNS0pCQ09VEwETFhoSFyQUDg9ZV1kWGg8SFR 0UWUFZT0tIVUpKS0NISFVLWQY+
X-HM-Sender-Digest: e1kMHhlZQR0aFwgeV1kSHx4VD1lBWUc6KxQ6Fyo4PT8TAzcOSy8eIyoR QxEaC0lVSlVKTUpJSUlMTUtJQkhKVTMWGhIXVQwaFRwaEhEOFTsPCBIVHBMOGlUUCRxVGBVFWVdZ EgtZQVlJSkJVSk9JVU1CVUxOWVdZCAFZQUxPQkM3Bg++
X-HM-Tid: 0a776040e5f4d993kuwsac94a1c00f7
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/fPzw7neAHog_OenngN0VHD4QLJc>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 01:00:17 -0000

Hi, Rob:

I have updated and uploaded the draft, to add one sub section 7.5 "E2E Path
Performance Monitoring", to include the following content.
Thanks for your comments.


Best Regards

Aijun Wang
China Telecom

-----Original Message-----
From: teas-bounces@ietf.org <teas-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Rob Wilton
(rwilton)
Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 6:07 PM
To: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>cn>; 'Rob Wilton (rwilton)'
<rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>rg>; 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip@ietf.org; teas-chairs@ietf.org;
teas@ietf.org; lberger@labn.net
Subject: Re: [Teas] Robert Wilton's No Objection on
draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-15: (with COMMENT)

Hi Aijun,

Yes, that text would be fine.

Thanks for accommodating.
Rob


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Aijun Wang
> Sent: 25 January 2021 03:10
> To: 'Rob Wilton (rwilton)' <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>rg>; 'The 
> IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip@ietf.org; teas-chairs@ietf.org; 
> teas@ietf.org; lberger@labn.net
> Subject: Re: [Teas] Robert Wilton's No Objection on 
> draft-ietf-teas-pce-
> native-ip-15: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Hi, Rob:
> 
> Thanks for your comments. How about to add the following subsection:
> 
> Section 7.5 E2E Path Performance Monitoring:
> It is necessary to deploy the corresponding E2E path performance 
> monitoring mechanism to keep assure that the delay, jitter or packet 
> loss index meet the original path performance aim.  The performance 
> monitoring results should feedback to the PCE to let it accomplish the 
> re-optimize process, send the update control message to related PCC if 
> necessary. Traditional OAM methods(ping, trace) can be used.
> 
> Or, would you like to give other suggestions?
> 
> Best Regards
> 
> Aijun Wang
> China Telecom
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: teas-bounces@ietf.org <teas-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Rob 
> Wilton
> (rwilton)
> Sent: Friday, January 22, 2021 6:23 PM
> To: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>cn>; 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip@ietf.org; teas-chairs@ietf.org; 
> teas@ietf.org; lberger@labn.net
> Subject: Re: [Teas] Robert Wilton's No Objection on
> draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-15: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Hi Aijun,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Aijun Wang
> > Sent: 22 January 2021 01:25
> > To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com>om>; 'The IESG'
> > <iesg@ietf.org>
> > Cc: draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip@ietf.org; teas-chairs@ietf.org; 
> > teas@ietf.org; lberger@labn.net
> > Subject: Re: [Teas] Robert Wilton's No Objection on
> > draft-ietf-teas-pce-
> > native-ip-15: (with COMMENT)
> >
> > Hi, Robert:
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: teas-bounces@ietf.org <teas-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of 
> > Robert Wilton via Datatracker
> > Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 6:00 PM
> > To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> > Cc: draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip@ietf.org; teas-chairs@ietf.org; 
> > teas@ietf.org; lberger@labn.net
> > Subject: [Teas] Robert Wilton's No Objection on
> > draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-15: (with COMMENT)
> >
> > Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-15: No Objection
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to 
> > all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to 
> > cut this introductory paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> > Please refer to
> > https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip/
> >
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --
> > COMMENT:
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > It might be helpful if this document had a short section covering 
> > operational considerations for monitoring and managing TE traffic 
> > when being deployed in this way.
> > [WAJ] You mean Path/Application performance monitoring? It is the 
> > traditional OAM methods that the operators are all familiar with.
> [RW]
> Yes.  If the same tools work and can be used then that sounds good.  
> It might still be worth having a section that describes that, even if 
> it ends up being just a paragraph.
> 
> Regards,
> Rob
> 
> 
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rob
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Teas mailing list
> > Teas@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Teas mailing list
> > Teas@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas

_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas