Re: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-sf-aware-topo-model

Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 12 March 2020 21:57 UTC

Return-Path: <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF753A0809 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 14:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EePzw_lBD5by for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 14:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2d.google.com (mail-io1-xd2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1764E3A07FF for <teas@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 14:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2d.google.com with SMTP id w9so7316323iob.12 for <teas@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 14:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0uckXUdiedcwBHn2Kg/Nd3XlsWGXO+Wa3NG5eTyCWTQ=; b=fzSm0mDk06wNCXgDIHE8Gwnnv+8P1tTz559cuSeTXGvBAIL6dYxp9sPk4t7Q0iSTsn uao9ygATcDiX0iLvL0LKKvKhUEZFyGS+Cfbhcvs18JIpt/l31uX8nSe2NPtRM/sdZeOJ NSL7gtD/2mo8x8o7VVXN/zhyXEpBxMhPEkHa1D/wBPOXUNRxkeBLXEUQG7rJYciloXH2 wLj6UoyuGess4ZvH6muDlG6y0zwVBBLe3Jx+hHSq35LGNO3pG1qPX27M816HkcmpcQQE 00+AtrxbqUjyNP5IFFrwHP0409vlxAlQNLqmr1g3JAG5IZlHynBa2A601A4zyYLmgAJ+ 8ZIA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0uckXUdiedcwBHn2Kg/Nd3XlsWGXO+Wa3NG5eTyCWTQ=; b=hvJQVcyLLPvbu/zKc/NFrjfXxGTMCyWzZuE8e0DC8lTBB6xpsacXeoMQ+viXyjc+Dq gUJ5tsyc9PPZ046Olvgp5x4CBNlSy/+aDqzag11Wii8mqxtg5zOWUO9linLW8yl7aAFZ 6UUG4j21MB68eLY0UmzoZ01rnx5cbByPI3XX8YLHooBjZaq/k2pO4Kp4TSvKZ+MFkk4D TlvUEUpLDgA0PmhM3JK9BMWjlqKC2rqKbKq1SvgyXJfarWE3aiXu5SKOdUd0E8w5bAk7 s0Xyg9YfXdb0q6QpYq4+BkXxca6++3ja8bX818ntK1uUOO1AO/1NztUG+sW5ZT4fTKrK xdhQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0g6qoIRctHu1NVD3b6cZaIQYdGGONegKnnrnXGQawy2HhGi2Wv VNz+tuEdfM8aEp/lZ3NwzM41BSLlAsPXoGarZMw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: =?utf-8?q?ADFU+vtI1gDoffalG3hC4STUZg8hClU92PxUu+Xz4mMd?= =?utf-8?q?vLXBrwllz0IdThczB8inInouEMjT5+0kuiSaKxrhooGVxrg=3D?=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:908a:: with SMTP id x10mr10092260jaf.16.1584050258256; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 14:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAEz6PPRNjcZZ+m9ZHX7zCyD7VqueftpZCW_UuyBdozfmzSik-g@mail.gmail.com> <030801d4e3bb$26523be0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
In-Reply-To: <030801d4e3bb$26523be0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 17:57:27 -0400
Message-ID: <CAEz6PPSih7=g4oZDWypP0+MX5T_h+8SPpdb98sg_RE9jfsw-GA@mail.gmail.com>
To: tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f328d905a0af70ea"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/vaubb_4I8mTAmZ1M1I6X2ilsJjU>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-sf-aware-topo-model
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 21:57:41 -0000

Hi Tom,

We have posted the updated version (
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-sf-aware-topo-model-05 ) to fix
the issues that you raised.
Thanks a lot,
- Xufeng

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 6:05 AM tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com> wrote:

> Xufeng
>
> Some quirks.
>
> Introduction/Abstract do not mention support or lack thereof  for NMDA
> (which the IESG have been calling for).
>
[Xufeng]: Added.

>
> Introduction does not have a reference for YANG leaving the question of
> version number uncertain
>
[Xufeng]: Added.

>
> Terminology fails to reference RFC8174
>
[Xufeng]: Fixed

>
> Expand on first use, perhaps in Terminology, is helpful - TOSCA, SF2LTP,
> SF2SF, SF2TTP,

[Xufeng]: Fixed


> CSO
>
[Xufeng]: Authors and contributors discussed CSO and decided to remove it
from this document and put it into a separate document.

>
> yang-version 1 is rather limiting
>
[Xufeng]: Use 1.1 now.

>
> YANG import statements lack references (which YANG 1.1 allows)
>
> /       reference "TBD";/
>        reference "RFC XXXX - SF Aware TE Topology YANG Model"; /
>
[Xufeng]: Fixed these statements.

>
>    module ietf-cso-dc
> no version
> no copyright
> no reference to the I-D
> no description clauses
> no reference clauses
> somewhat short of ready IMHO- I think that this needs a lot of work!
>
[Xufeng]: As mentioned above, CSO is removed from this document and planned
to be put into a separate document.

>
> IANA Considerations
>    RFC Ed.: In this section, replace all occurrences of 'XXXX' with the
>    actual RFC number (and remove this note).
> I suggest that this apply throughout the I-D and that the Note is placed
> at the start, before the Introduction (the RFC Editor are happy with
> just the one note)
>
[Xufeng]: Changed as suggeted.

>
> RFC6020 is a better reference for the IANA Considerations
>
[Xufeng]: Right. Use  RFC6020 now.

>
>    [I-D.ietf-netmod-revised-datastores]
> RFC8342
>
[Xufeng]: Fixed.

>
>    [I-D.ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams]
> RFC8340
>
[Xufeng]:  Fixed.

>
>    [I-D.ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo]
> RFC8345
>
[Xufeng]: Fixed.

>
>      import ietf-actn-vn {
> does not appear in section 1.3
>
[Xufeng]: Added.

>
> Tom Petch
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Xufeng Liu" <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
> To: "TEAS WG" <teas@ietf.org>
> Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2019 12:02 PM
> Subject: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-sf-aware-topo-model
>
>
> > Current Status:
> >
> >   *  The updated revision -03 was posted on Mar 11, 2019:
> >
> >      > Editorial fixes.
> >
> > Open Issues:
> >
> >   *   None.
> >
> > Next Steps:
> >
> >   *  Update the document to align with the latest versions of
> >      referenced documents, including draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo,
> >      RFC8340, RFC8342, RFC8345, and RFC8459.
> >   *  Update the section of Security Considerations according to latest
> >      guidelines.
> >   *  Get further reviews.
> >   *  YANG doctor's review.
> >   *  Working Group Last Call after completing above.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > - Xufeng
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Teas mailing list
> > Teas@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
> >
>
>