[Teas] Regarding IPR on Search Results Web results draft-dt-teas-rfc3272bis-11

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Tue, 09 June 2020 14:50 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 871623A079B; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 07:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SD9J35xtItg7; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 07:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x135.google.com (mail-il1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D9233A0477; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 07:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x135.google.com with SMTP id 18so20538559iln.9; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 07:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XLvDvDHq2OJW0Y5QI+9AtnQ1hmSv4FNOx6fq942KDz0=; b=TY6lt1BCZehGlKnlD/2yEZqCxStJ7Q2wHZ7u3dVbT+UjtizUimT6QN1aJc2NrfNtmB 4X44YoIHQaI6eSKAeFi5drg4uaDKRPQAwOCSuB2TuGj0meNuwUdPAJif4g8kEJCxTrjn 3Xc8WwfWpUWy47rXF7VK4+viwLjuvAm4d5YnKgDIcvYR3njG0bIFB09P7rzzht8iTUju T4ip9aOE5Hxzcp0xi4faY0BJMHG+pQz702LoQC7x91Rz11E2sk0EZkI2GNsYBnzS49qy HdlJ8NhHr+LYvQ3pqWOikmWevKOuBZyHr4COhZC3FGI24wJJIsrn+8/jzxY4BRkVFU2a qytg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XLvDvDHq2OJW0Y5QI+9AtnQ1hmSv4FNOx6fq942KDz0=; b=RZFbiokHPNRxduJ2qSn+F6mwX6hU3Iv6poQ8CvuMpC72FhSxUvFTVMfU6wKc3tiUsa ZctksoVRZ2suOWcBjPocwE00VvZ53t0K1fx99PZBwfNfhC9Ndawjr4Xdz9lNQe5GN2fU PELGYkt+0ttS5vk4Gbh2rtG1pX/w4POkz0EDp5LgjXugV+u6M640hwS/C7iNTxKqxD2s V0crg/eWpKhWJndypgp29rTwBEuA052/Qpa9qT0VIcruTukANi5wzpQYvaTFPAupk3jo hlAnTpVgaIUS9mQcNR1kI3P7UD9TjfQ171S1T75NzunqNAyhgftqo+b8HUGhzJGbe3H2 InBw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533n/vFL0ACqxHHWOlUvJA32LaWMmT/ShEyBTKNUckyhKYg/eTkS 14jm0cWnqBbLVIz79u7C0pBP9haCrgKVdOjHo2g=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyK+4T1Bc4oDQbjrUqiXzMzL8mG+ozWYgxBjcnUMP5UDVxfWIfDUsgRoQl5tpOvR6cACPGG7tBW1BksrfLNdDw=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:eee:: with SMTP id j14mr27451551ilk.261.1591714252301; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 07:50:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 09:50:41 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTuZggA3eCMPfhErX=RvbuC3AjoPEeCB_TbuqJgYc8a4SQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, Gert Grammel <ggrammel@juniper.net>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000097a9e805a7a7da11"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/vmcQPMMb2wX15jreLZQVdvag0lo>
Subject: [Teas] Regarding IPR on Search Results Web results draft-dt-teas-rfc3272bis-11
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 14:50:55 -0000

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for polling for WG document adoption:

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?

  Please state either:

  "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
  or
  "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

  "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
  or
  "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
  appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
MESSAGE'S TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
Pavan