IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TICTOC] [Ntp] WGLC for draft-ietf-ntp-mac

Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com> Tue, 29 August 2017 02:35 UTC

Return-Path: <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2CD5126B71; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 19:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CTRcME9TwNSE; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 19:35:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAA5B120721; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 19:35:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id b82so12642020wmd.1; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 19:35:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SXG7y1WnI8g/D26RfK30FU/YcdJyrmaH1H7QzCgV4FM=; b=L+barebLVAGvraZxlIf5bCigjYIX0opjtWE3xeFp7n1ADAOVOIwl5+NDFV4L1QIWba c8dmboCgfquWTw/qQjxT8tENSEnP5Uu6nbFIPWsOnqYcS3QHW5jT9f0co7SESrQF1O3K nsqi64VKR4lWZOH5SmVHewjx9NiyePoF4kWmBOAbRYO+TPEagKmnso8H+puoKy9PfAZK L1ND/LNrIJv0a0Se5vQB5F+gsa6yGEQj8UXoyzJcrkG5OYl56S55bbiwAOeRVb09ssjO IN5hzvD42ImPTo//H55e3peXoT+rK1uqoize9/vKl62iRQRVEJw+pQyWbaT9eZsTFrwC U87g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SXG7y1WnI8g/D26RfK30FU/YcdJyrmaH1H7QzCgV4FM=; b=LXD25fkbyLRwJUQrEp8AJbao2whsobyRRaRK7pevvGZ+Di4zlIqrrJhb5aupxjLZ9W cyFpFwNMoY1PsKCaL6DF51PUZvjOQU8bkp3K6+irAY00QmW9odwyGGnsOwv+0sGK2Hep ykerSup+TW6b7I1iFKbbCxVnvnnZmf2Dd06vN3LPIksGoEgQHxXfp8cjg3KT7UQAJhcZ 8VQpJljLYKSxGopem18Q74AIJibUqE72ktB1svetS2hQCwu1xRpHXVhc2E8UmehfksXg xVGAE32jsyXHUCRa7J7lE1gDt/lNpOBUhMYli9b+gnefhACVrxcmULVYqHAwkwdbZpND dUYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5iVioQSKn0osNmhqiE5hUmmFAun22NwK6Lh7GwEe0YULCIbRexE mBZyQvrRZa36C4uRFblkB3TdhYz11w==
X-Received: by 10.80.151.90 with SMTP id d26mr2038342edb.19.1503974120224; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 19:35:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.80.157.140 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 19:35:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CF57EAFE-31F0-4ADD-A209-1802DB6CA643@isoc.org>
References: <CF57EAFE-31F0-4ADD-A209-1802DB6CA643@isoc.org>
From: Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 22:35:19 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJm83bB3fT+7gga-mn=UNTyLXfbb3uHxMJRpC=T=sg1kvu99BQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>
Cc: "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>, "tictoc@ietf.org" <tictoc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tictoc/YmXx7EiAzHvg1KriuhbBfobLEaI>
Subject: Re: [TICTOC] [Ntp] WGLC for draft-ietf-ntp-mac
X-BeenThere: tictoc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock BOF <tictoc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tictoc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 02:35:25 -0000

I support advancement of this draft. My only editorial comment at this
point is that I think several of the references currently listed as
normative, specifically RFC 1321, 6151, and 7696, should properly be
listed as informative.

On 8/9/17, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> This begins a three week working group last call (WGLC) for "Message
> Authentication Code for the Network Time Protocol"
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ntp-mac/
>
> Please review and provide comments to the mailing list by no later than 31
> August 2017. Earlier comments and discussion would be appreciated. Please
> note that the chairs will be using this WGLC to determine consensus to move
> this document forward to the IESG.
>
> Also, as a reminder, we have migrated the working group mailing list to IETF
> infrastructure. Please respond to ntp@ietf.org<mailto:ntp@ietf.org>.
>
> Regards,
> Karen and Dieter
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email