IETF Logo Mail Archive

[TICTOC] Antw: Re: [Ntp] WGLC for draft-ietf-ntp-mac

"Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> Tue, 29 August 2017 07:49 UTC

Return-Path: <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Original-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C23B7132620; Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:49:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8GNBMKVCs4JQ; Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:49:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rrzmta1.uni-regensburg.de (rrzmta1.uni-regensburg.de [194.94.155.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AE6913235C; Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:49:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rrzmta1.uni-regensburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 579815D006; Tue, 29 Aug 2017 09:49:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de (gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de [132.199.5.51]) by rrzmta1.uni-regensburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6875CE9C; Tue, 29 Aug 2017 09:49:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from uni-regensburg-smtp1-MTA by gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 29 Aug 2017 09:49:23 +0200
Message-Id: <59A51C80020000A100027A4B@gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 14.2.2
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 09:49:20 +0200
From: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
To: Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>, odonoghue@isoc.org
Cc: "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>, "tictoc@ietf.org" <tictoc@ietf.org>
References: <CF57EAFE-31F0-4ADD-A209-1802DB6CA643@isoc.org> <CAJm83bB3fT+7gga-mn=UNTyLXfbb3uHxMJRpC=T=sg1kvu99BQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJm83bB3fT+7gga-mn=UNTyLXfbb3uHxMJRpC=T=sg1kvu99BQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tictoc/nq2shZezp3TsA67_sQzY474Q_k0>
Subject: [TICTOC] Antw: Re: [Ntp] WGLC for draft-ietf-ntp-mac
X-BeenThere: tictoc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock BOF <tictoc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tictoc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 07:49:26 -0000

>>> Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com> schrieb am 29.08.2017 um 04:35 in
Nachricht
<CAJm83bB3fT+7gga-mn=UNTyLXfbb3uHxMJRpC=T=sg1kvu99BQ@mail.gmail.com>:
> I support advancement of this draft. My only editorial comment at this
> point is that I think several of the references currently listed as
> normative, specifically RFC 1321, 6151, and 7696, should properly be
> listed as informative.

I just cross-checked: The first two are INFORMATIVE, the last one is BCP 201. ;-)

[...]

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email