IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TICTOC] [Ntp] WGLC for draft-ietf-ntp-mac

Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com> Fri, 01 September 2017 20:23 UTC

Return-Path: <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C28B1270AB; Fri, 1 Sep 2017 13:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xnXcpUDSCrmQ; Fri, 1 Sep 2017 13:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22c.google.com (mail-wm0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74E901342E3; Fri, 1 Sep 2017 13:23:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id r202so2846488wmd.0; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 13:23:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UkWds0k6vsap2HLKRfuB0xV8j6wweesZDM9UbP3VahY=; b=vFcwv+tBwNmhSKMjzy8XnCHAObHD5NywEbYt6+R7TfN7uIhVt18DbtFK4jsSMo4d+7 G3b43rh6LX6dmHOlAq4+dqdnZOwp4Et/G3HXJ05XSiPcoHX3ID+V5G3sfnH2ku7yalHO SUdBytY4DzwAKbcId4Ppws7Lj4CxKszhry4fhAOAjUZM0HGC8p0A/LdzitS0XB8Fx7xH jLe9xGRBSyB/86YybrDo5uwcRZCuzvnrvlFhUt6YjSwPBKDCOW+dh9Z+YmbT8R66hke+ L+dqerzoYFpE/ok5LiFkEy/humPwAstbTgj5L/yjlwbjMPTy7BZPx4yTPEgcr0F6+GLl FNOg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UkWds0k6vsap2HLKRfuB0xV8j6wweesZDM9UbP3VahY=; b=osrMDI4Q80tRu6D6C+lze7FeyP+kKqbimSW26uP0rBm84uHvkodDaEKBl0NLeUnWYz yCR/uvH7nN4u1w+iq48L0SDtoCErD4YaLuhZq/vC6vQ5mT98hhwf3uY5PQ/jNEUFFQOX EDU/5IHPPtQF7myGUBtZrmSHfOzjZpoNVgIynT/W04MMek/vUzweVxxAtiRWmUZkEo6W QjM+lUW/PNfHMh3WhtAvIJ/dm1hb4TX83AEebTZ+5NCwZGxXL29ljTW3RuT2mbVoT40d f+cgHwaqiPXmPMZNZZDPz+HJqfN9JRXvpO0+QHj1iNM15sojXoD53tG0cI24TgVm3sMr B/vg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjiURi7C3Kze8QsU+P59UMDjFJ8hTjB9HaX3Pn+UtCEkNksTssN kGqCYxvD22OMJpGlZmX35977WfHhpQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb4uACUrScjYmo+UPXfoJxg+e5l06G+rbVbSznJ8Lu2hdW9afxAn2EKCc3t6H6zxbWkJmpi4f5+90qdgUGBj9Xo=
X-Received: by 10.80.215.29 with SMTP id t29mr2569510edi.141.1504297398792; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 13:23:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.80.157.140 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Sep 2017 13:23:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJHGrrTsrun4Rk7NbBwkT0nY-TP_fdMEGfcNrY+724cqRGsNGQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CF57EAFE-31F0-4ADD-A209-1802DB6CA643@isoc.org> <CABUE3Xm+C8kvmQLKj7F=nASgPrqTJVyvdUcGYudkab6EnaisOA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJHGrrTsrun4Rk7NbBwkT0nY-TP_fdMEGfcNrY+724cqRGsNGQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2017 16:23:18 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJm83bCcU8PSOTwJEh3WsR6S3RQvHLg1zPgd5PdAE=CPhaTgZA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sharon Goldberg <goldbe@cs.bu.edu>
Cc: Tal Mizrahi <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com>, "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>, "tictoc@ietf.org" <tictoc@ietf.org>, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tictoc/w5oqs83XWVmSbvEu8qnCXcIrtFw>
Subject: Re: [TICTOC] [Ntp] WGLC for draft-ietf-ntp-mac
X-BeenThere: tictoc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock BOF <tictoc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tictoc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2017 20:23:36 -0000

On 9/1/17, Sharon Goldberg <goldbe@cs.bu.edu> wrote:
>> Less major comments:
>> - Missing security considerations section.
>
> Yes, will add.

Oif, how'd I overlook that until now? Everything that needs discussion
is already discussed IMO, you just need to move it into a section with
the required title.

>> - Missing IANA considerations section.
>>
>
> Given the way we are dealing with algorithm agility, I don't think IANA
> considerations are relevant.

By policy, the IETF requires the section to be present when it's
submitted to the IESG, but it can be empty, like so:

8. IANA Considerations

None.

[RFC EDITOR: please remove this section before publication]

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email