IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TICTOC] Comments on the proposed 1599v2 YANG model

Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com> Mon, 07 November 2016 03:14 UTC

Return-Path: <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868BF129B6F for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 19:14:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.718
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.718 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v0Bdrj48KsBm for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 19:14:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EACE129B6E for <tictoc@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 19:14:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CZV12044; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 03:14:03 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEMA414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.73) by lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 03:14:02 +0000
Received: from SZXEMA506-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.3]) by SZXEMA414-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.73]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 11:13:53 +0800
From: Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>
To: Joseph Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>, "tictoc@ietf.org" <tictoc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TICTOC] Comments on the proposed 1599v2 YANG model
Thread-Index: AQHSN6bKJmgnv96nG0yFeAlDQ/UbJqDM1AyQ
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 03:13:53 +0000
Message-ID: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B91776F10@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <20161105165400283070.8dd800cd@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <20161105165400283070.8dd800cd@comcast.net>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.74.203.119]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-7"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090203.581FF17B.0052, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.4.3, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 3d98576109d15b6979615fc6d322c89d
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tictoc/fID18IfVsqeziUN_hF2fUHKJvKg>
Subject: Re: [TICTOC] Comments on the proposed 1599v2 YANG model
X-BeenThere: tictoc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock BOF <tictoc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tictoc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 03:14:07 -0000

Hi Joe,

Thank you a lot for the thorough review. To resolve your comments, we will post an updated version after IETF 97 (when the submission of drafts is re-opened).

Cheers,
Yuanlong

-----Original Message-----
From: TICTOC [mailto:tictoc-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Joseph Gwinn
Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2016 4:54 AM
To: tictoc@ietf.org
Subject: [TICTOC] Comments on the proposed 1599v2 YANG model

To the TICTOC working group:

Attached find my redlines against draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-00 dated 20 October 2016.

Where the arrows point should be text highlighted in yellow, but the yellow may be faint in some readers.

Joe Gwinn

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email