IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tls-reg-review] Early code points for ECH

Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net> Wed, 27 May 2020 16:59 UTC

Return-Path: <caw@heapingbits.net>
X-Original-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18C53A0FDB; Wed, 27 May 2020 09:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=heapingbits.net header.b=a/egw0M5; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=XS+NdEr2
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4pPLMp55UARq; Wed, 27 May 2020 09:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 507313A0F04; Wed, 27 May 2020 09:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B81E15C0140; Wed, 27 May 2020 12:59:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap4 ([10.202.2.54]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 27 May 2020 12:59:08 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heapingbits.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :cc:subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=VgWmATajMveSGBR93G0aofdoaa0U R9WAhARjU6vdJqw=; b=a/egw0M5Bl1hqoHjqd/IpRigis7vvpjPDjGcBqBYiSyZ N0NQ4jHa1m54LUhEcOqA5IPjeCkDKSqFSIrIxHXru3iJtPwkdAZNi+7K7TbXVWbg BeCE4+yqXgz+Ps6UAHZXwJa7UeILV+0m4JlwPaYn9VaHu1b5/zfE9hDirWfcomiK KDqelcu+0qGkndFSxquTndUSY87nIIPlFPx4xHxdzwRIk9AJCt47JrN2IxPF5gHL 5MBOfoA0AnB2jpbqlFCutqhu/e+FvZdvgWmS+uGFbpam4lnPpjMTua02r4+0OdYF GAXaHJobwJUmbMJWwmWzJaxICk87VHjQ6P5SFoAGxg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=VgWmAT ajMveSGBR93G0aofdoaa0UR9WAhARjU6vdJqw=; b=XS+NdEr2R1w9i4OBegwkFM g6Ed5vIfDn4B9vHFZN4+WzOgL5RjazH1nNan4+DY7XZP5DY8RkrJLQ/AB9XlP1oT giTltrjXxQluCsK6nodCYx190cCD7SwyNJx4W8VJif53Q+NaKhiTSgzBl9Jexsxm 4rlWSsSLYgkLVXtnz0faRW+1yC5v6S3hVD2aUfQnTcvpGh9NVwTH9tQ+pgKj82kl 1ukHayun5gl6abjwq0QX+ZNzpvuKh7Q1gEg8c1wNXOS/fJmH0TIsDpFvUvVPzfvO +XWwpULTxYpSgJgMfCQugoPokd8rF5wZA78s0Fa94b6PlrcV/tpqK/IK8Cj8X4tQ ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:XJzOXpYc5HsnnciP2eIb3TA4PNBIHPQFQQ-mI5iIo9caIof5liUXtQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedruddvgedgleejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdevhhhr ihhsthhophhhvghrucghohhougdfuceotggrfieshhgvrghpihhnghgsihhtshdrnhgvth eqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgfevgeegffdvueegveevgfevffeludelffegjedufffh feekgeeuudegtdevffdtnecuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvg hrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegtrgifsehhvggrphhinhhg sghithhsrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:XJzOXgYMDWgwmuuwJ1ECTu_F1MnwFKGepfFqXO879uW99atvp13HIQ> <xmx:XJzOXr_aQ0c43QxqL6hTcMOSP5PeN05BQ71qztf_8-tk8abQy_WydQ> <xmx:XJzOXnopY92yFO6CgcSPwGJ1gObS-wdMlg030REEzS8AkUWMRp5WmA> <xmx:XJzOXrTwg7vMcHQ9wwZ-8siyBSqE_9yxfyyheWmVE2e7gJddtulHbA>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4CE263C00A1; Wed, 27 May 2020 12:59:08 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-dev0-488-g9249dd4-fm-20200522.001-g9249dd48
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <cf98de83-835b-4b85-a925-91c09c23c6b9@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <608C29D8-AB1D-4EBE-874A-9A332D1B51D1@gmail.com>
References: <f8a52d53-9eee-4545-8e51-239a1113d7ca@www.fastmail.com> <20200526222155.GV58497@kduck.mit.edu> <685f0d09-ba06-4887-b039-5ba87b2271e2@www.fastmail.com> <608C29D8-AB1D-4EBE-874A-9A332D1B51D1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 09:58:21 -0700
From: Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, "tls-reg-review@ietf.org" <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>, TLS Chairs <tls-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls-reg-review/QCO17WRlZSsqSPtRR1VVOFhJKZA>
Subject: Re: [Tls-reg-review] Early code points for ECH
X-BeenThere: tls-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TLS REVIEW <tls-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 16:59:11 -0000

On Wed, May 27, 2020, at 9:32 AM, Yoav Nir wrote:
> Any experimental extension should use something from the private use 
> range. For extensions that is 65282-65535.
>
> The problem is when people want to keep their extension number after 
> standardization so they squat on code points.

Can you elaborate on this point? I'm not sure I follow. 

(As for ECH, are you OK with the early assignment?)

Thanks,
Chris

> 
> > On 27 May 2020, at 1:24, Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net> wrote:
> > 
> > That's a good question. It seems we should have a documented policy or strategy for "extension experiments." (If there is one, I've either not seen it or [more likely] forgotten about it!)
> > 
> > On Tue, May 26, 2020, at 3:21 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 02:44:25PM -0700, Christopher Wood wrote:
> >>> Hi folks,
> >>> 
> >>> I'd like to kick off the early codepoint allocation process for ECH. We have two extensions that need codepoints. Based on the existing registry, I chose the next two unassigned values and proposed them in this PR:
> >> 
> >> Not really relevant to the current request, but I wonder whether the
> >> experts have opinions on sequential allocation vs. random allocation.
> >> 
> >> -Ben
> >> 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > tls-reg-review mailing list
> > tls-reg-review@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email