IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1180467] expert review for draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator (tls-extensiontype-values, tls-parameters, )

Sabrina Tanamal via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> Mon, 23 May 2022 22:54 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC08FC20D651 for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 May 2022 15:54:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.627
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.627 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r9va-WxujJ3c for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 May 2022 15:54:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2d0:201::1:81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45F8EC20D64D for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 May 2022 15:54:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from request4.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEE4FE2E2C; Mon, 23 May 2022 22:54:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request4.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9C26B215BE; Mon, 23 May 2022 22:54:51 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: sabrina.tanamal
From: Sabrina Tanamal via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org>
Reply-To: drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-28282-1652795031-1691.1180467-9-0@icann.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1180467@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-22664-1602780894-1622.1180467-37-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-17319-1602782099-1034.1180467-37-0@icann.org> <CF9B1567-7769-4A3F-AD05-F696544EA0FF@akamai.com> <E77C115E-2F94-4852-B121-CA159335C545@akamai.com> <2686D3F2-CC8B-4F47-9E86-987FA1E429DE@gmail.com> <rt-4.4.3-2160-1617819647-1517.1180467-9-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-30000-1652736069-148.1180467-9-0@icann.org> <10790540-CF87-4957-8444-1FE94915C6E9@akamai.com> <rt-4.4.3-28282-1652795031-1691.1180467-9-0@icann.org>
Message-ID: <rt-4.4.3-11190-1653346491-526.1180467-9-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1180467
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.4.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: sabrina.tanamal@icann.org
CC: rsalz@akamai.com, tls-reg-review@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 22:54:51 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls-reg-review/a8Btvh4Vz62-yWEnSKp74vZ9BpE>
Subject: [Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1180467] expert review for draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator (tls-extensiontype-values, tls-parameters, )
X-BeenThere: tls-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
List-Id: TLS REVIEW <tls-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 22:54:56 -0000

Hi Rich, all, 

I have a note and a question:

1) There appears to be a duplicate of the "EXPORTER-client authenticator handshake context" label in Section 8.2. I'll point this out to the authors when we send our list of completed actions for this document. 

2) Which value should we assign for the TLS HandshakeType registration in Section 8.3? Should we assign a value from the 17-19 range or the 27-253 range? 
Value 7 is also currently unassigned. 

The registry is here: 

https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-parameters

The document is here: 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator/

Thanks,
Sabrina

On Tue May 17 13:43:51 2022, rsalz@akamai.com wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/16/22, 5:21 PM, "Sabrina Tanamal via RT" <drafts-expert-review-
> comment@iana.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Rich, Yoav, Nick,
> 
> The IESG has approved version -15 of this document:
> 
> I looked at the diff, https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--
> hwdiff&url2=draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator-15.txt
> 
> They should have made 8.2 be a table :)
> 
> Still approved.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email