IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1180467] expert review for draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator (tls-extensiontype-values, tls-parameters, )

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 24 May 2022 13:13 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD5A8C15E6DF for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2022 06:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.669
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.575, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K0mLmnmw8WbT for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2022 06:13:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6ADEC15E6E6 for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2022 06:13:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050095.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 24OC75wI010567; Tue, 24 May 2022 14:12:43 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=wkOFIiQxflXO0ERz9bR0+Nd/RxbYF24xs2tjjiseVrQ=; b=Y0BtPKBWK4bsh2cNky4TQWKSZtgmJQ4BQeSHP130EFh82wZ0EBQHTtSka7dpaAwD337o ET8/LN9W2DUrPYcoTtaFhtmxWsPDGxfP0Dsjnczunw6+igcdX1peS+NCpftCKD2eyNIg nkV1mWTXevK23ZtdWj7XxE74hjiyzwCsRCn9JCcCpXTAkhI0esW8DouJEQbAgVF08sCh ZHNPdBd/HDamKUTjMtmnhn/C3METKd8LQMeOs9+b1hP1+Mcw2WjECduRJZQ52ED4FyxI aDqRvLVYm49/owHSltsifPaFe8sHPdJhDthPWNyqTOyS7dqX0e6826+buTXLyErge0YB Gw==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19] (may be forged)) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3g6s176fdb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 24 May 2022 14:12:42 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 24OD6F0B004290; Tue, 24 May 2022 09:12:41 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.31]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 3g6udymwr6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 24 May 2022 09:12:41 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.121) by usma1ex-dag4mb7.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.91.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.2.986.22; Tue, 24 May 2022 09:12:40 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.121) by ustx2ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.121) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.36; Tue, 24 May 2022 08:12:39 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.121]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.121]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.036; Tue, 24 May 2022 08:12:39 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org" <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org>
CC: "tls-reg-review@ietf.org" <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [IANA #1180467] expert review for draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator (tls-extensiontype-values, tls-parameters,)
Thread-Index: AQHYaWrgkg2I8b5B4UupOlkcp1tMi60jJg2AgAn3XeeAAO9S/g==
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 13:12:39 +0000
Message-ID: <1653397959008.74506@akamai.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-1180467@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-22664-1602780894-1622.1180467-37-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-17319-1602782099-1034.1180467-37-0@icann.org> <CF9B1567-7769-4A3F-AD05-F696544EA0FF@akamai.com> <E77C115E-2F94-4852-B121-CA159335C545@akamai.com> <2686D3F2-CC8B-4F47-9E86-987FA1E429DE@gmail.com> <rt-4.4.3-2160-1617819647-1517.1180467-9-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-30000-1652736069-148.1180467-9-0@icann.org> <10790540-CF87-4957-8444-1FE94915C6E9@akamai.com> <rt-4.4.3-28282-1652795031-1691.1180467-9-0@icann.org>, <rt-4.4.3-11190-1653346491-526.1180467-9-0@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-11190-1653346491-526.1180467-9-0@icann.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.47.237]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.486, 18.0.874 definitions=2022-05-24_05:2022-05-23, 2022-05-24 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=779 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2205240066
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: lr3TFy72QPnVVk7TdD_KY9xRrJp5XlHf
X-Proofpoint-GUID: lr3TFy72QPnVVk7TdD_KY9xRrJp5XlHf
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.874,Hydra:6.0.486,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-05-24_07,2022-05-23_01,2022-02-23_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=777 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2205240067
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls-reg-review/yBwgS6V0she10nj99LBJgrYI97k>
Subject: Re: [Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1180467] expert review for draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator (tls-extensiontype-values, tls-parameters, )
X-BeenThere: tls-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: TLS REVIEW <tls-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 13:13:18 -0000

I'd like to keep "lucky number 7" for something REALLY REALLY important. :)  I'd pick 17. But it doesn't matter much to me.
Good catch on the duplicate label.
________________________________________
From: Sabrina Tanamal via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org>
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2022 6:54 PM
Cc: Salz, Rich; tls-reg-review@ietf.org
Subject: [IANA #1180467] expert review for draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator (tls-extensiontype-values, tls-parameters,)

Hi Rich, all,

I have a note and a question:

1) There appears to be a duplicate of the "EXPORTER-client authenticator handshake context" label in Section 8.2. I'll point this out to the authors when we send our list of completed actions for this document.

2) Which value should we assign for the TLS HandshakeType registration in Section 8.3? Should we assign a value from the 17-19 range or the 27-253 range?
Value 7 is also currently unassigned.

The registry is here:

https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-parameters__;!!GjvTz_vk!W4E843fr3N8qTtmijIsR9tlDYmVQBiqe3WO6ZDtdEafgqeFizTDIOIc56p1M_mHeO71_GkwT48wE0xsG3_7PzLw$

The document is here:

https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator/__;!!GjvTz_vk!W4E843fr3N8qTtmijIsR9tlDYmVQBiqe3WO6ZDtdEafgqeFizTDIOIc56p1M_mHeO71_GkwT48wE0xsGCTbcGzc$

Thanks,
Sabrina

On Tue May 17 13:43:51 2022, rsalz@akamai.com wrote:
>
>
> On 5/16/22, 5:21 PM, "Sabrina Tanamal via RT" <drafts-expert-review-
> comment@iana.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Rich, Yoav, Nick,
>
> The IESG has approved version -15 of this document:
>
> I looked at the diff, https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--__;!!GjvTz_vk!W4E843fr3N8qTtmijIsR9tlDYmVQBiqe3WO6ZDtdEafgqeFizTDIOIc56p1M_mHeO71_GkwT48wE0xsGYgcFPNI$
> hwdiff&url2=draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator-15.txt
>
> They should have made 8.2 be a table :)
>
> Still approved.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email