Re: [TLS] 4492 ECDH_anon

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 22 July 2015 09:29 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776781AD079 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 02:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IEXj3DvxR3nM for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 02:29:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com (mail-wi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA6171ACEBF for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 02:29:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so162923101wib.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 02:29:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=d/ncUP7AIqLwNsEZVvBp5jqmbZXXMh+NqAXvpIWuIUY=; b=OkkKt3FNjey3x23RIsGmFTayRLYIwHuTHQP+x/+Cm70l/UVYG2H/U3IGAQuc0q6zJV pNao3k6LvEYHL8Eh0wKwxv4C7thQIlZwyxZHafcpZQmganVclm0cUnKhNO17kj+8U6xa Jsdg4itkCHLRwclEI7QRe4e27Xdu2tZzJlqpthCXbNU387OCosLcbhMyasXBnoItlO7O YARDajjLnmueagOqDQ+hTQVDJnCg27YsubYXJGzXRKpXmjV2aahbcUinbjcFPLEq6deP QuT6OIaLe/RH0J2fFKG71m8VKi1MI5TIqb0feHwZqHt5c49vnFULDeUvLh64SJkUhbaF 7TOg==
X-Received: by 10.194.58.199 with SMTP id t7mr3275760wjq.45.1437557387577; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 02:29:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:176:8185:dc96:74af:5eec? ([2001:67c:370:176:8185:dc96:74af:5eec]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id eu2sm2423082wic.8.2015.07.22.02.29.45 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Jul 2015 02:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnV7mzwe-Y8Nn0SWbfBS8cM+-pXXOqsYiMfF8PitN6WJ=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 11:29:43 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E3B69C38-A84C-447C-BD0B-35CE69504854@gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnV3b76rr=v2GVkcrFdJGomb_Yg91zU7yZLOXp5-onfLRA@mail.gmail.com> <F3004EE0-3A40-4058-A36E-1AAB30072E19@gmail.com> <CABkgnnV7mzwe-Y8Nn0SWbfBS8cM+-pXXOqsYiMfF8PitN6WJ=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/4-u_ibncjpfdCzFrz-6Q654O97E>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] 4492 ECDH_anon
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 09:29:50 -0000

PR at https://github.com/tlswg/rfc4492bis/blob/master/draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis.xml ?

> On Jul 22, 2015, at 11:23 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 22 July 2015 at 02:20, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> They both provide forward secrecy.
> 
> The draft specifically excludes ECDH_anon from the following
> statement, implying otherwise:
> 
>   The ECDHE_ECDSA and ECDHE_RSA key exchange mechanisms provide forward
>   secrecy.
> 
> It might be a good idea to revise that.