IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Status of X.509v3 TLS Feature Extension?

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 29 April 2014 21:28 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71EE1A093C for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 14:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d5aLEdC0MCph for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 14:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com [72.246.2.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8BF61A096B for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 14:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771A52858C; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 21:28:10 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay07.akamai.com (unknown [172.17.121.112]) by prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63173284F4; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 21:28:10 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from usma1ex-cashub.kendall.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-cashub6.kendall.corp.akamai.com [172.27.105.22]) by prod-mail-relay07.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E52B8003C; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 21:28:10 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([169.254.1.146]) by USMA1EX-CASHUB6.kendall.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.105.22]) with mapi; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:28:10 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>, Paul Lambert <paul@marvell.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:28:09 -0400
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Status of X.509v3 TLS Feature Extension?
Thread-Index: Ac9j72eua3hDJ2JUSoCPOFzH+ZKYhQAAmwaw
Message-ID: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C7130742B777@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C7120C61F669@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <20140428180218.C805D1ACE1@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp> <m2r44hw86f.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <CF855F95.39E86%paul@marvell.com> <CAL9PXLzCOyi2eWF39+oj0uEFWoU4muYBNm3hRYuZ-vepPxgN+A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9PXLzCOyi2eWF39+oj0uEFWoU4muYBNm3hRYuZ-vepPxgN+A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/5gEYxvTgr_FG9g74AIy2eSwyIyE
Cc: Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Status of X.509v3 TLS Feature Extension?
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 21:28:14 -0000

> It might well be that Must Staple is best done for just the leaf and that pushed CRLs are used for intermediate revocations.
> That's the deployment model that I think is mostly likely.

+1

--  
Principal Security Engineer
Akamai Technologies, Cambridge, MA
IM: rsalz@jabber.me; Twitter: RichSalz

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email