Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design

Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net> Fri, 19 August 2022 00:37 UTC

Return-Path: <caw@heapingbits.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39B3C1524DE for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 17:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.808
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.808 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=heapingbits.net header.b=FC94dYdi; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=uqpmJheD
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 75wCvTimmn9a for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 17:37:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 124E9C1524D1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 17:37:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32EB85C01F5 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 20:37:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap41 ([10.202.2.91]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 18 Aug 2022 20:37:05 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heapingbits.net; h=cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1660869425; x=1660955825; bh=riMOJhOpc4 VInDZJvCdWcvu5a43iRjVQ/PX96Go6bDA=; b=FC94dYdisbSlPUqkgN091Ci61v Ln2sYO1dbr0vJY59XUqd8zqMZ2xoNY512OWSS1GmWzseHuV+wS2lxsINMCnRAmkk enMv1w9Te+pD6WjKqP5AWoVZgc3mWXBSrrc1PR2lLEKXIzurCXSD19PAzGDhLwOz 7zu9tg4voO3mHM6hMOfMojnHWYopmwV6YeaXymX2O2KtELuaD/bA+3csZZYXI4Lm wQcD0YiIY6aaTZC6/Lu3isdRRxw7fGTth3tsIYEQVsDsntcnXXwhczy9JTTqY+cO QvtLKXrlRWyv9shdy1AJjtbpBfklUqTIbHsUP4ihxFn5B6Z/6/ZKn5Hqi2Cg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; t=1660869425; x=1660955825; bh=riMOJhOpc4VInDZJvCdWcvu5a43i RjVQ/PX96Go6bDA=; b=uqpmJheDLc3onXNZtoecBRWktfcIXEsqaRpvqAW6igqZ mk9pgaGI/+kg157S2RaG6rkW7A5x9nzW0+w6ei3fx7xh3pGI3ibxBetm8QaDyccH L725d/ls4wAxh5AsVSE+hqeS3iyN4RCCBopsFblbW2hUGtWlAcwN1lYQmOdRw295 lwE/jmm68E8t8B0Dcf/63gV04KgxjYGc9ke1UddQ6X6o0SbQ6QoBSoP/krV4Bphm 6er+3WeAdWokDkhLw40ppFXI3NVVBqACDTqq4/ZFy+fDr7XHoPpQqdMpo196LnNp 2wlbKlgpgpn0Kqzzv1oWj8TwPhirrIC1Ot5IfV4+Nw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Mdv-YpBKCjtuS7tJynRx45La3CGxOAfS2K8B56N2nfqgLh9pTJrnPQ> <xme:Mdv-Yng7FUeFgFfZG8X1UhuQ_ChW_dqFHZxo3wd7XkUQ2VCLAjuX3Ki3ZElkNjwjS RCkoPr4c60-8orBNIg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrvdeitddgfeejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttd ertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfvehhrhhishhtohhphhgvrhcuhghoohgufdcuoegtrgif sehhvggrphhinhhgsghithhsrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefgveeggeffvd eugeevvefgveffleduleffgeejudffhfefkeeguedugedtvefftdenucffohhmrghinhep ihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilh hfrhhomheptggrfieshhgvrghpihhnghgsihhtshdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Mdv-Ykl6eDFZm2TFou_iiog8uxMGVFrPOlua6IndJxQEyQmIRDVcsQ> <xmx:Mdv-YjwTWZz-osU4XtEqlKKUsgXtnKEKS2liFD9K0K009SDddI54vg> <xmx:Mdv-YuTcyJi592A2tJjJ3YCXGunb4x4U7lsEa2JRoNJyVyIni5d-0A> <xmx:Mdv-Yld3w8NleqJ6LpdjROfPhTyoM01Q6SMfIrTF9vL4lBHym5GKZw>
Feedback-ID: i2f494406:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id EF8802340077; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 20:37:04 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-841-g7899e99a45-fm-20220811.002-g7899e99a
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <f4e61343-05a5-4e82-9c0d-a0c1e4254dd8@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <11dc2ed6-ff64-4088-a637-d00149468f46@www.fastmail.com>
References: <27E9945C-6A0A-46DD-89F0-22BE59188216@heapingbits.net> <e43fc649-3fc6-333b-c44d-55de0627c710@cs.tcd.ie> <Ymz7yncQAnzmp/eL@LK-Perkele-VII2.locald> <38de10e6-ab3c-6ea1-44b7-57057c97e7aa@cs.tcd.ie> <CH0PR11MB5444D7D4F32F195FFB189C10C1679@CH0PR11MB5444.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <320bb3ca-890b-45c9-b55f-f0d65bdce7be@beta.fastmail.com> <CH0PR11MB544415C31AEE99D67DFE0B50C16D9@CH0PR11MB5444.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <11dc2ed6-ff64-4088-a637-d00149468f46@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 20:36:43 -0400
From: Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net>
To: "TLS@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/7-wdJHbLPvM0nREfT0chLub0M1A>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 00:37:11 -0000

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022, at 7:57 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2022, at 22:39, Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer) wrote:
>> Actually, that was our original intention with this draft - to specify 
>> the framework, and to have other documents specify the actual pairs.  
>> However, I believe that the sense of the working group is that they 
>> want this draft to start with a limited number of options (and people, 
>> please correct me if I'm wrong).
>
> I'm saying that that is not a good idea.  Drafts are cheap, and this 
> one is done.  If that is counter to the sentiment of the working group, 
> then so be it.

(Chair hat on)

We specifically parked this document in its current post-WGLC state to sort out the issue of codepoints, be it here or in a separate companion document. Either way, the draft is not yet done.

Best,
Chris 

>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls