IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Thu, 18 August 2022 23:58 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D2BC152597 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 16:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.808
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.808 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=U+xMXkYo; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=3uWSBI12
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AGiAcWdLnn0t for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 16:58:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C26AC14F74A for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 16:58:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4BBB5C0226; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 19:58:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap41 ([10.202.2.91]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 18 Aug 2022 19:58:01 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1660867081; x=1660953481; bh=cJp+WLweZ3 a48rdrlvf2sK52kZTuCY2YSmFkZi4e+8E=; b=U+xMXkYoNmvqlc2cmclKEBiClT AYiem12AvShR48S6lwLgCYq/J056An1XfxI7S2K7XDYWN/ePq3V3lbMU1vcvieid QUlzEmMxPSspGI8S7i7TDkSSf7SmGA415czvZP17OOdRE3+sz3zZmGjbsQ7+60qH XwJ6AnMFU4GqdIJz5pw0XQkjO9+eThL4Q47JWPqyG16xVt2PWYEH77iVFbBnVDXW wJCCQBwNBX4S1tZ0zQMei8dv2n7B6t5qxC0ckWYUs82SPnTVks6Ziqf6DNXynJ1m fEYyLJ7W1lPwQwG3gGe4wFrSt6PQ2gKQJqGmEvTx2WSjuGVIpbBRGG8RL8FA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; t=1660867081; x=1660953481; bh=cJp+WLweZ3a48rdrlvf2sK52kZTu CY2YSmFkZi4e+8E=; b=3uWSBI12QFFmpn6AENc7rj/KMaV5/XlKMowCc9IWBsjG uxlNhpMs+nm1lL4qyB6hqwhsUgs+80KZzSaaYenEQTXMq7+GxESURAUV5tjXWS3P avHjxb0Ceuaz8jkUbdKFgWz+is+mJC8I6Nn7WwBt0pQ/d0rnI/JA/cFYweaUh2KA /Lq1zFljrpk7ROZCH7rPrJtnnVea+My1is+faKywSZ5RHLbH/jabfnn1VxdVYnLy VV5u/roTGfBvGjU61rLyPUiRI6Ztkma4yz595YsKlw/18buJFR9Oo2zTTpa2viDa zR2+5BjNYYIbcjQrECisJoetPlBGsiI2tSUElRHOMg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:CdL-YoO14GSUv-a_XRDmgmdufHADaReSt4pDHVINyTz-vMBuQNsQbw> <xme:CdL-Yu8Wew28frc2FwxfRF8EtWXJJgG1BhE0v2W_vmWeWMkjMKErZj5vMUrVQbkR7 bSvpqUSRN80OBhS65w>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrvdeitddgvdekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdforghr thhinhcuvfhhohhmshhonhdfuceomhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeetueeikedtkeelfeekvefhkeffvedvvefgkefgleeugfdvjeej geffieegtdejnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepmhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:CdL-YvTVt7GKyQrzWThZle8vUmOhV3dB3ExVrvG2b2Ai5utgr7j2iQ> <xmx:CdL-Ygu9Uu9yw5vfEaNpI3XdEp14EDJEQVgjJ-3sX_i1VZ47e3gYPA> <xmx:CdL-YgckekhsZ770dvrbaGh1Ty8WrqwvbVw79b5e0dKmSOBPd9wZ1g> <xmx:CdL-YqqYa2GB16FNpn3E7_MCCDe9IpK8nNMbg8QwVC5L-0eyXneNCw>
Feedback-ID: ic129442d:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8A378234007B; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 19:58:01 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-841-g7899e99a45-fm-20220811.002-g7899e99a
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <11dc2ed6-ff64-4088-a637-d00149468f46@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CH0PR11MB544415C31AEE99D67DFE0B50C16D9@CH0PR11MB5444.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <27E9945C-6A0A-46DD-89F0-22BE59188216@heapingbits.net> <e43fc649-3fc6-333b-c44d-55de0627c710@cs.tcd.ie> <Ymz7yncQAnzmp/eL@LK-Perkele-VII2.locald> <38de10e6-ab3c-6ea1-44b7-57057c97e7aa@cs.tcd.ie> <CH0PR11MB5444D7D4F32F195FFB189C10C1679@CH0PR11MB5444.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <320bb3ca-890b-45c9-b55f-f0d65bdce7be@beta.fastmail.com> <CH0PR11MB544415C31AEE99D67DFE0B50C16D9@CH0PR11MB5444.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 09:57:40 +1000
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: "Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer)" <sfluhrer@cisco.com>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/7E7AJ9pUsWefSmtjppt0U7LR-_s>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 23:58:09 -0000

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022, at 22:39, Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer) wrote:
> Actually, that was our original intention with this draft - to specify 
> the framework, and to have other documents specify the actual pairs.  
> However, I believe that the sense of the working group is that they 
> want this draft to start with a limited number of options (and people, 
> please correct me if I'm wrong).

I'm saying that that is not a good idea.  Drafts are cheap, and this one is done.  If that is counter to the sentiment of the working group, then so be it.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email