Re: [TLS] integrity only ciphersuites

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Tue, 21 August 2018 13:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D0F6130DD3 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 06:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YWRk3ksqR9F5 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 06:12:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from straasha.imrryr.org (straasha.imrryr.org [100.2.39.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3606B12D7EA for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 06:12:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.161] (unknown [192.168.1.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by straasha.imrryr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 15F384746 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 09:12:10 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
In-Reply-To: <D67B2BB4-C445-4443-898B-EF1AFC5BF64D@dukhovni.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 09:12:09 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <03F080BE-E263-43C8-9845-BA4E0C9A62AF@dukhovni.org>
References: <E29465D4-E4C5-466F-9E3F-240E258DC7C2@cisco.com> <CABcZeBNpgnfBerkutLB0jKA4vF_FrpXNHnEeKQhAOFm-y=xJsA@mail.gmail.com> <D67B2BB4-C445-4443-898B-EF1AFC5BF64D@dukhovni.org>
To: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/8qnVsiM11EEmVZYg-xU7sq68hWE>
Subject: Re: [TLS] integrity only ciphersuites
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 13:12:13 -0000


> On Aug 21, 2018, at 12:32 AM, Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> wrote:
> 
> There is also a use-case for communication between processes on the same
> machine, e.g. over unix-domain sockets and the like.  Encryption in this
> context is pointless.  TLS can be used with client certificates as a means
> of client authentication.

I should note that disabling encryption is not always a performance
win.  Depending on the machine's hardware and assembly support in
libraries AEAD with AESGCM may be faster than SHA256 without encryption.

-- 
	Viktor.