Re: [TLS] PR#345: IANA Considerations

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Mon, 16 November 2015 23:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE61E1A8A9A for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 15:19:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OFpn1dXtLNZV for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 15:19:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yk0-x235.google.com (mail-yk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 722F81A8A7A for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 15:19:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ykba77 with SMTP id a77so266210395ykb.2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 15:19:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm_com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=EBBwv6IOqgQYcetkKloQCxNbYIoDDzWjPQEM02JzUck=; b=zjvY28/ZHdkhgpzLR246T0F8A+cZT+2FoB+RTdF6bgtvkE+Yqc3ZTsdVz5mm9yM36u 99ls7LLYfPbfwdcgRUvCq16wtmHuIEiEpLBCal6hpAKvFuyI+JNp2XjX484lJFAKd2Uf UZuHb0gbdf13ANQWr7Q+ozgPrBAe0hr3QcCeHcpSfqmuZEbghRClNhMHiBhWsQlerCIz SZfK1EQdokdSUVTkRYhlmaZZ9YyulHjj8t24VLPou1VFePtiYW/eMxGWUIr/FWL8DE0M OV0zQ4JkAevDeV6FQKdtqalcXSIM23of2LqoB0gz4VVPEPiAhl52yxFKHAvYQGAGGWXP Gh1Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=EBBwv6IOqgQYcetkKloQCxNbYIoDDzWjPQEM02JzUck=; b=YjRb3u6kYuK21tNfZqYhtEAGcKzHy/wuW/Y06gsjGeqG+VTm0qYq3pZPjsol74RzRq p5TcagStTuQjo/3oBpGsxMKv739QXnT6Ld78tYwerj46WtRKqC/SbQcx7sGUBsIYSSYD 895523QEtdrjh9A+kSr8avyLLglUXIN4OBDcn6xujOsJCSWLj6hPlYl+s1YZIIHGWpJW zd6ZxW5rUpOch5/zz+RU4cftlB0yrzIcSDEhse4qKONKz9OcScJnglQefekwURHh97XQ sqqxVNmaDbLTrn3Try8t7UBntJbN+38eLVsHGTNd8uFEGloCGJreLh+gTn928Fp1GDjc mfBA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl1LonQuO6cQBLdrmbbypI6vHZHGa27Yz8wgTpC2t73Iu2eBVHS1bau7VZBjeuaNbTs0Wih
X-Received: by 10.13.249.4 with SMTP id j4mr37728734ywf.129.1447715965762; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 15:19:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.13.221.203 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 15:18:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBNMkJSQAm0gFZdecG8Nf+df+heP2V_u9pXGJmb7jV4BcQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABcZeBNMkJSQAm0gFZdecG8Nf+df+heP2V_u9pXGJmb7jV4BcQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 15:18:46 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBOD71keb_yE4EumgkOxXfOCnsniLrhDa3tHzsioE2E2bw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0826e8e030840524b0a3c7"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/AuLfEmN7tuOsYcPPuiXJM2YVh4I>
Subject: Re: [TLS] PR#345: IANA Considerations
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 23:19:27 -0000

Double-checking, I see that some of the entries in the "TLS 1.3" column
for Extensions are wrong. Will be updating shortly.

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

> PR: https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/345
>
> Per discussion in Yokohama, I have rewritten the IANA considerations
> section
> so that the 16-bit code spaces are "Specification Required" and they have
> a "Recommended" column.
>
> 1. The Cipher Suites "Recommended" column was populated based on
>     the Standards Track RFCs listed in the document (and I removed the
>     others).
>
> 2. The Extensions "Recommended"column was populated by taking all
>     the Standards Track RFCs and marking them "Yes" and marking
>     others "No". I recognize that this probably marks a bunch of extensions
>     which we actually don't love as "Yes" (and perhaps others as "No")
>     and if people want to move some from one column to another, that
>     seems like a great mailing list discussion which I will let the chairs
>     drive.
>
> Thanks,
> -Ekr
>
>
>
>
>