IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] PR#345: IANA Considerations

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 17 November 2015 21:29 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0321A8955 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 13:29:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.585
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.585 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y5RtedloBJGh for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 13:29:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com [23.79.238.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 774B01A8957 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 13:29:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D1D425330; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 21:29:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com [172.27.118.251]) by prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78EB4EBC3; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 21:29:27 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; s=a1; t=1447795767; bh=+OS80JUN/AnXQdU7JRyEju5kZ6vwg848E/HduXZg8MM=; l=4320; h=From:To:CC:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=OHKjxfFFCAabZAAiDSYrM+gf0uIigh3Oaj1Ckl9ZG3kIVlqaswJVe/Tep1hWGfxOy K7uwP1GKQ/TeTOoPfdyDTopeoEiP30VlxVlgqq0n27ZZP36wIUb8q7NmOXuCE4uhkD FEeH5o6e5Pn25Wx6gqwTj2co/RL7npnH+iSmZGfY=
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (ecp.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.123.34]) by prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A1A2044; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 21:29:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.65) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1076.9; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 13:29:27 -0800
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1076.000; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 16:29:27 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Joe Salowey <jsalowey@tableau.com>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] PR#345: IANA Considerations
Thread-Index: AQHRIMT8CS9oUKnbLUaF4RPUQ/eAPJ6fnJAAgAD1swCAAAuxAIAABB+AgAAfHYCAABJHAP//6JnA
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 21:29:26 +0000
Message-ID: <ee328a0f34a94cd3979833a1bb6ca5f6@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <CABcZeBNMkJSQAm0gFZdecG8Nf+df+heP2V_u9pXGJmb7jV4BcQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOD71keb_yE4EumgkOxXfOCnsniLrhDa3tHzsioE2E2bw@mail.gmail.com> <EAA07156-6F05-488B-A3E5-175100989449@sn3rd.com> <CABcZeBMn4BcpYLgoqFb=PuW92jnfhEK8cw7nStZEyh9RDdN6XQ@mail.gmail.com> <A61BBA75-2594-4DF7-8EF6-887B2F001DA1@sn3rd.com> <7276DA5B-0563-4D70-A611-96A2E80CAECB@tableau.com> <CABcZeBMN3mL3KYjMEjBqeZ+33it5Oi4BvO8zdz-2aXcs479bTQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBMN3mL3KYjMEjBqeZ+33it5Oi4BvO8zdz-2aXcs479bTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.32.133]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_ee328a0f34a94cd3979833a1bb6ca5f6usma1exdag1mb1msgcorpak_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/wDmzs2KGrurX1AQUfUDMOYuJW-U>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] PR#345: IANA Considerations
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 21:29:30 -0000

I prefer to see two categories:  recommended and “no comment”
MUST or SHOULD are recommended and everything else is “no comment”
Having one pool, from which we can cherry-pick, as opposed to finer levels of gradation, seems simpler.  If and when we’re ready to move Goldilocks/448 to recommended, it will not matter that it’s in the same pile as 3DES-CBC.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email