Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-extns-00<
"Omirjan Batyrbaev" <batyr@sympatico.ca> Sat, 27 January 2007 02:00 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HAcrs-0005fk-Pv; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 21:00:36 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HAcrr-0005ff-HL for tls@ietf.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 21:00:35 -0500
Received: from simmts7-srv.bellnexxia.net ([206.47.199.165]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HAcrq-0003XH-6r for tls@ietf.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 21:00:35 -0500
Received: from pbo8f8e10aowa ([65.94.222.190]) by simmts7-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with SMTP id <20070127020033.ZAYB25276.simmts7-srv.bellnexxia.net@pbo8f8e10aowa>; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 21:00:33 -0500
Message-ID: <006a01c741b7$1969e760$49af5e41@pbo8f8e10aowa>
From: Omirjan Batyrbaev <batyr@sympatico.ca>
To: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>, home_pw@msn.com, nelson@bolyard.com
References: <E1HAc9s-000363-00@medusa01.cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-extns-00<
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 21:01:46 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b19722fc8d3865b147c75ae2495625f2
Cc: tls@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tls@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tls-bounces@lists.ietf.org
see: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Gutmann" <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz> To: <home_pw@msn.com>; <nelson@bolyard.com> Cc: <tls@ietf.org> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 8:15 PM Subject: Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-extns-00< > Nelson B Bolyard <nelson@bolyard.com> writes: > > >I still have not heard a convincing case that this stuff belongs in TLS. > >There doesn't seem to be consensus in the WG that it belongs in TLS, either. > > I've already pointed this out before, why not make it an Experimental RFC? > That's exactly what they're there for. Speaking of Experimental RFC - is it allowed to have an Intellectual Property in them (or not to surender any of it to IETF)? And what it takes to be Experimental RFC? -Omirjan > > Peter. > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@lists.ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… home_pw
- RE: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Mark Brown
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… home_pw
- RE: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Kemp, David P.
- RE: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Mark Brown
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Martin Rex
- RE: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Stefan Santesson
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… home_pw
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… home_pw
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Martin Rex
- RE: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Kemp, David P.
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… home_pw
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Martin Rex
- RE: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Mark Brown
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Nelson B Bolyard
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Omirjan Batyrbaev
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… home_pw
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… home_pw
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Russ Housley
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… home_pw
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… home_pw
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Russ Housley
- RE: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Peter Williams
- RE: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Kemp, David P.
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Martin Rex
- RE: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Peter Williams
- Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Russ Housley
- RE: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Peter Williams
- RE: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-… Kemp, David P.