Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-extns-00<

pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz (Peter Gutmann) Tue, 30 January 2007 00:20 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HBgjR-0002tD-Mm; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:20:17 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HBgjR-0002t3-2W for tls@ietf.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:20:17 -0500
Received: from chico.itss.auckland.ac.nz ([130.216.190.12]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HBgjN-0004Bm-4h for tls@ietf.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:20:16 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by chico.itss.auckland.ac.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC0C342F9; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:20:08 +1300 (NZDT)
Received: from chico.itss.auckland.ac.nz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtpb.itss.auckland.ac.nz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21508-19; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:20:08 +1300 (NZDT)
Received: from iris.cs.auckland.ac.nz (iris.cs.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.33.152]) by chico.itss.auckland.ac.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C57D340FD; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:20:08 +1300 (NZDT)
Received: from medusa01.cs.auckland.ac.nz (medusa01.cs.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.34.33]) by iris.cs.auckland.ac.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD2E251400F; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:20:07 +1300 (NZDT)
Received: from pgut001 by medusa01.cs.auckland.ac.nz with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1HBgjK-000051-00; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:20:10 +1300
From: pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz
To: martin.rex@sap.com
Subject: Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-extns-00<
In-Reply-To: <200701291624.RAA12296@uw1048.wdf.sap.corp>
Message-Id: <E1HBgjK-000051-00@medusa01.cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:20:10 +1300
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mailhost.auckland.ac.nz
X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7bac9cb154eb5790ae3b2913587a40de
Cc: tls@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tls@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tls-bounces@lists.ietf.org

Martin Rex <martin.rex@sap.com> writes:

>TLS Evidence has many problems that are beyond fixing, because of how it is
>architected and probably because it needs these for its hidden agenda.

Just for the record I agree that TLS Evidence is Wrong for all the reasons
already given, I was just trying to find some middle path.

Peter.


_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls